2018
DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20187309009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Border Area Conflict Impact on Government Responsiveness Relating on Public Service

Abstract: Responsiveness or response are the desire and the will of the bureaucracy in the expectations, desires and aspirations and demands of the community services provided quickly and responsively. The responsiveness of government bureaucracy needs to be done across Government jurisdictions begin from the Central Government to the border region. However, the occurrence of conflict affirmation borders of Magelang regencies and cities affected the responsiveness of regional pemerinrah in the service of public administ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of urban development is not only at the level of reviewing problems such as air, air runoff, land pollution, carbon emissions, and livability but can be studied through land use, which is directly related to the availability and documentation of urban green space. Public orientation, in this case land use that reduces vegetation density, needs to be considered as part of policy settings by the government [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of urban development is not only at the level of reviewing problems such as air, air runoff, land pollution, carbon emissions, and livability but can be studied through land use, which is directly related to the availability and documentation of urban green space. Public orientation, in this case land use that reduces vegetation density, needs to be considered as part of policy settings by the government [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the low population density in rural border, providing facilities has high per capita costs. Together with the perception of border as a backward area, higher cost per capita in essential public services makes borderland unappealing for development (Eny et al, 2018;Mangels & Riethmüller, 2018). Meanwhile, the borderline appeared to be flexible and permeable (Cappellano & Makkonen, 2020;Martins, 2020;Varol & Soylemez, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%