2016
DOI: 10.1364/oe.24.00a956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing different classification methods in airborne hyperspectral imagery processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies in the literature (e.g., [68][69][70]) indicate that the texture information of VHR airborne optical images can represent a proxy to describe forest structure variables (e.g., crown diameter, tree height, tree density or spacing). For these reasons we applied a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification method [71] to our hyperspectral images, using as input the BRDF cover index [7], the three most prominent components of the hyperspectral reflectance images obtained with the Principal Components Analysis method [72], and the Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) texture features [73]. The GLCM texture features (i.e., mean, variance, homogeneity, contrast, dissimilarity, entropy, second moment, and correlation; [74]) are extracted based on the first principal component data with a window size of 9 × 9 pixels.…”
Section: Land-cover Stratification (Pre-classification)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies in the literature (e.g., [68][69][70]) indicate that the texture information of VHR airborne optical images can represent a proxy to describe forest structure variables (e.g., crown diameter, tree height, tree density or spacing). For these reasons we applied a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification method [71] to our hyperspectral images, using as input the BRDF cover index [7], the three most prominent components of the hyperspectral reflectance images obtained with the Principal Components Analysis method [72], and the Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) texture features [73]. The GLCM texture features (i.e., mean, variance, homogeneity, contrast, dissimilarity, entropy, second moment, and correlation; [74]) are extracted based on the first principal component data with a window size of 9 × 9 pixels.…”
Section: Land-cover Stratification (Pre-classification)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GLCM texture features (i.e., mean, variance, homogeneity, contrast, dissimilarity, entropy, second moment, and correlation; [74]) are extracted based on the first principal component data with a window size of 9 × 9 pixels. In this study, coniferous forest, broadleaved forest, bare soil, urban, and unclassified were classified, with most unclassified pixels in our dataset represented by the cast-shaded areas in the deep gullies and canopy gaps [71].…”
Section: Land-cover Stratification (Pre-classification)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum likelihood (MLC) algorithm is a classical classification algorithm for remotely sensed images, and the support vector machine (SVM) method has been a popular and effective classification algorithm in recent years [ 22 ]. We compare the classifier based on MLC and SVM algorithm with the classifier based on ISBDD algorithm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dalponte et al used hyperspectral data to classify northern forest tree species and used three classifiers (e.g., support vector machine, random forest, and maximum likelihood method) to classify tree species, proving that hyperspectral data are very effective in classifying the forest types of northern forest tree species [53]. Kozoderov and Dmitriev used different classifiers to identify tree species in hyperspectral images and found nonlinear classifiers were more suitable for hyperspectral data classification [54]. Schull et al used AVIRIS (Airborne Visible InfraRed Imaging Spectrometer) RS images to identify tree species using characteristic factors related to spectral information and crown structure and found these factors can improve the accuracy of tree species classification [55].…”
Section: Research Advances Of Plant Hyperspectral Rs Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%