2020
DOI: 10.3390/rs12030432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Kernel-Driven BRDF Approach to Correct Airborne Hyperspectral Imagery over Forested Areas with Rugged Topography

Abstract: Airborne hyper-spectral imaging has been proven to be an efficient means to provide new insights for the retrieval of biophysical variables. However, quantitative estimates of unbiased information derived from airborne hyperspectral measurements primarily require a correction of the anisotropic scattering properties of the land surface depicted by the bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF). Hitherto, angular BRDF correction methods rarely combined viewing-illumination geometry and topographic i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
(183 reference statements)
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The convergent pattern displayed in our case after BRDF correction to reflectance values with various sensor viewing angles is consistent with previous studies [48], [102], indicating the BRDF correction is able to produce reflectance data that are comparable at various viewing angles. It is worth noting that, compared to the diurnal data samples, after BRDF correction, the change of STD of reflectance values derived from pixels at different viewing angles is less apparent (Figs.…”
Section: B Brdf Correctionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The convergent pattern displayed in our case after BRDF correction to reflectance values with various sensor viewing angles is consistent with previous studies [48], [102], indicating the BRDF correction is able to produce reflectance data that are comparable at various viewing angles. It is worth noting that, compared to the diurnal data samples, after BRDF correction, the change of STD of reflectance values derived from pixels at different viewing angles is less apparent (Figs.…”
Section: B Brdf Correctionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A variety of kernel functions have been developed in previous studies. For geometric-optical scattering kernel (K geo ) [45], Li Sparse-Reciprocal kernel (LSRK) that assumes sparse canopy, Li-Dense Reciprocal kernel (LDRK) for a dense canopy [51], which often provides superior performance in the case of high solar and/or view zenith angles [48], [52], as well as sparse and dense transition Li Transit-Reciprocal kernel (LTRK) [53] were developed in previous studies. The kernels can be derived as follows [47], [51], [54]: The values for the parameters h/b and b/r (object shape and height) were determined after iterative testing [49].…”
Section: Brdf Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notations vol k , geo k , vol f , and geo f indicate the volumetric and geometric kernels and their weight coefficients, respectively, and iso f is a scalar represents the isotropic reflectance. To create a semi-empirical model that fits for cases with high solar and(/or) view angles (Jia et al, 2020), we use the hotspot-revised Ross-Thick-Maignan (RTM) (Maignan et al, 2004) volumetric kernel and Li-Transit-Reciprocal (LTR) geometric kernel (Li et al, 1999;. The computation of the RTM and LTR kernels is given by:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A least-squares solution of this equation system provides an estimate of the coefficients , , iso vol geo f f f . We use these coefficients to calculate the anisotropy factor (Jia et al, 2020) for each measurement. The anisotropic factor describes the ratio between the directional reflectance and a reference reflectance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such developments have been published in the past to (i) map forest heterogeneity [35]- [37], (ii) characterise various surface scattering types (i.e., land cover types) [38], [39], and (iii) correct BRDF effects in forest canopies [40]. For alpine landscapes, a respective BRDF model has to be adapted to the predominant land cover types.…”
Section: Brdf Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%