2010
DOI: 10.1109/led.2010.2045631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature-Dependent $I$– $V$ Characteristics of a Vertical $\hbox{In}_{0.53}\hbox{Ga}_{0.47}\hbox{As}$ Tunnel FET

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
100
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
7
100
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the reduced E beff decreases the blocking barrier, which enhances both the BTBT probability and traps assisted tunneling process at OFF-state condition. 27 Furthermore, the bandgaps of source and channel materials also decreased with reducing E beff , and a small energy gap leads to an additional increase of the OFF-state leakage due to more pronounced thermal emission process. 28 Therefore, a proper E beff with appropriate bandgap energy in source and channel layer should be selected in order to fulfill high I ON with desired I ON /I OFF ratio.…”
Section: Device Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is due to the reduced E beff decreases the blocking barrier, which enhances both the BTBT probability and traps assisted tunneling process at OFF-state condition. 27 Furthermore, the bandgaps of source and channel materials also decreased with reducing E beff , and a small energy gap leads to an additional increase of the OFF-state leakage due to more pronounced thermal emission process. 28 Therefore, a proper E beff with appropriate bandgap energy in source and channel layer should be selected in order to fulfill high I ON with desired I ON /I OFF ratio.…”
Section: Device Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 4 orders of magnitude higher OFF-state leakage current was observed from the structure C than that from structure B due to higher defect density within the source/channel interface and channel/drain layers of structure C. The value of I OFF was extensively amplified due to the broken band alignment nature of structure C. In this case, the direct BTBT process dominates the OFF-state transport, 10 which is different as the Shockley-Read-Hall recombination mechanism in the OFF-state transport of most staggered gap TFETs. 10,27 An additional negative gate bias is required to turn off the OFF-state tunneling mechanism. 29 Besides, I ON of the TFET from structure C is smaller than that from structure B under the same applied drain voltage.…”
Section: Device Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.2(e), we fix the VGate-VSource voltage while measuring source/drain current versus source/drain voltage (ID-VD) of an In0.53Ga0.47As TFET, that has a poor gate oxide [24]. Effectively, this is a 2-terminal measurement on a 3-terminal device.…”
Section: Measuring the Electronic Transport Band Edge Steepnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, the conductance is proportional to the tunneling density of states. (e) The G=ID/VD versus VD for an In53Ga0.47As TFET is plotted [24]. The measured subthreshold swing voltage is 216 mV/decade while the semilog conductance swing voltage is 165 mV/decade.…”
Section: Measuring the Electronic Transport Band Edge Steepnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation