2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13204-019-01142-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TEM studies of structural defects in HgTe/HgCdTe quantum wells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, five QWs can be seen clearly, with the QW width being not less than 7.8 nm, the value provided by the in situ ellipsometry. High-resolution images of “dark areas” from the overview micrographs ( Figure 1 b) revealed defects similar to the ones studied in a recent work [ 38 ].Based upon the lateral average of contrast, we obtain the average width for QWs d = 8–12 nm. Notably, the QW width determined from TEM images in a recent work was also 2 nm larger than that extracted from the ellipsometry data [ 20 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…However, five QWs can be seen clearly, with the QW width being not less than 7.8 nm, the value provided by the in situ ellipsometry. High-resolution images of “dark areas” from the overview micrographs ( Figure 1 b) revealed defects similar to the ones studied in a recent work [ 38 ].Based upon the lateral average of contrast, we obtain the average width for QWs d = 8–12 nm. Notably, the QW width determined from TEM images in a recent work was also 2 nm larger than that extracted from the ellipsometry data [ 20 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Both images provide evidences of HgTe layers (QWs) with reasonably clear interfaces. A study of the defects visible in the layers allowed for tentatively identifying them as stacking faults, dislocations, dislocation loops, and lattice deformations …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study of the defects visible in the layers allowed for tentatively identifying them as stacking faults, dislocations, dislocation loops, and lattice deformations. [13] Figure 3 shows STEM/HAADF images of the studied samples. The images have a magnification similar to that used in Figure 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%