2014
DOI: 10.1365/s38314-014-0226-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teleoperated Driving Robust and Secure Data Connections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Winfield [33] presents the basic components of a teleoperated system: the robot (remote vehicle), the remote place of work (teleoperation station) and the connectivity between the two components, while different approaches for a Teleoperated Driving system design [15], [26] already exist. Chucholowski et al [9] measured the latency of video-streams over 3G networks while driving. Their measurements reveal a highly varying average latency of 121 ms and state that 3G connections may be sufficient for Teleoperated Driving.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Winfield [33] presents the basic components of a teleoperated system: the robot (remote vehicle), the remote place of work (teleoperation station) and the connectivity between the two components, while different approaches for a Teleoperated Driving system design [15], [26] already exist. Chucholowski et al [9] measured the latency of video-streams over 3G networks while driving. Their measurements reveal a highly varying average latency of 121 ms and state that 3G connections may be sufficient for Teleoperated Driving.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a lot of measurements have been conducted already, it is hard to map these results to Teleoperated Driving specifically. For instance, some studies [9], [19] focus on 3G networks only, some studies lack either throughput [21] or upload measurements [22], [25], while others include limited amount of driving (120 km) [34] or stick to specific routes [27]. Teleoperated Driving is presented in [17], but real measured values are missing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Latency over wireless networks varies over time and space. The exact variation depends on many factors, but field tests have shown average video streaming latencies of 121 ms (Chucholowski et al, 2014) and 205 ms (Shen et al, 2016) over 3G networks, and 183 ms over 4G networks (Shen et al, 2016). Two-way latency was measured over LTE networks at 75-83 ms (Dano, 2013) and about 100 ms (Kang et al, 2018;Liu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Technical Feasibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This simple example, describing only one aspect of intervehicle cooperative awareness message already poses requirements on maximum tolerable end-to-end latency of approx-imately 3.3 ms. Empirical simulations as well as field tests show that neither 3GPP based LTE nor WAVE/ITS-G5 cannot satisfy such requirement on latency [17]. WAVE/ITS-G5 is also challenged to transmit the required by [16] payload in such a short amount of time: the message transporting the offered trajectories has an estimated size of 4 kB.…”
Section: A Ultra-low Latency and Very High Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%