Chalcogenide‐capped octahedral hexatechnetium(III) complexes, Cs4[Tc6S8Br6]·CsBr (Cs4[1]·CsBr) and (PPh4)4[Tc6S8Br6] {(PPh4)4[1]}, (PPh4)4[Tc6S8I6] {(PPh4)4[2]}, [Tc6Se8I2] ([3]), and [Tc6Te15] ([4]) were synthesized. Single‐crystal X‐ray structural studies were carried out for Cs4[1]·CsBr, [3], and [4]. Sulfide‐capped octahedral hexatechnetium(III) clusters [1]4– and [2]4– are discrete complex anions, whereas the selenide‐ and telluride‐capped hexatechnetium(III) complexes adopt extended polymeric structures. A cyclic voltammogram of [1]4– in CH3CN showed two one‐electron redox waves: Tc6(24e/23e) and Tc6(23e/22e). The potential of the Tc6(24e/23e) process is more positive than that of the Re6(24e/23e) process for the hexarhenium analog [Re6S8X6]4– (X = Br, I), whereas that of the Tc6(23e/22e) process shifts to negative values compared to the potential of the Re6(23e/22e) process. Thus, the Tc6(23e) mixed‐valence state is thermodynamically less stable than Re6(23e).