2012
DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2011.597153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Talker-specific perceptual adaptation during online speech perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
96
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
96
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies that have looked at general accent adaptation (i.e., not to specific accent markers) did show a beneficial effect of exposure to multiple speakers (e.g., Bradlow & Bent, 2008;Sidaras et al, 2009). In fact, listeners are even able to adapt to an accent when the experiment contains one accented and one native speaker (Trude & Brown-Schmidt, 2012). One possible explanation of this result is that it was easier for participants in the Trude and Brown-Schmidt study to contrast native pronunciations with the accented mispronunciations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Studies that have looked at general accent adaptation (i.e., not to specific accent markers) did show a beneficial effect of exposure to multiple speakers (e.g., Bradlow & Bent, 2008;Sidaras et al, 2009). In fact, listeners are even able to adapt to an accent when the experiment contains one accented and one native speaker (Trude & Brown-Schmidt, 2012). One possible explanation of this result is that it was easier for participants in the Trude and Brown-Schmidt study to contrast native pronunciations with the accented mispronunciations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, there is mounting evidence that processing of phonetic information goes far beyond distinguishing phonemes (Clayards, Tanenhaus, Aslin, & Jacobs, 2008;Ju & Luce, 2006;McMurray, Tanenhaus, & Aslin, 2009b;Mitterer, Chen, & Zhou, 2011;Newman, Clouse, & Burnham, 2001;Trude & Brown-Schmidt, 2012). Exquisite perception and memory for detail have also been shown in auditory (Agus, Thorpe, & Pressnitzer, 2010) and visual processing (Brady, Konkle, Alvarez, & Oliva, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that familiarity with speaker variation facilitates speech processing (e.g., Allen & Miller, 2004;Bradlow & Pisoni, 1999;Eisner & McQueen, 2005;Nygaard & Pisoni, 1998;Nygaard, Sommers, & Pisoni, 1994;Yonan & Sommers, 2000) and may restructure linguistic representation (e.g., Creel, Aslin, & Tanenhaus, 2008;Dahan, Drucker, & Scarborough, 2008;Kraljic, Samuel, & Brennan, 2008;Norris, McQueen, & Cutler, 2003;Trude & Brown-Schmidt, 2012). Nygaard et al (1994), for example, found that after learning to identify different speakers during training, listeners performed more accurately on a word recognition test if the words were spoken by familiar rather than unfamiliar speakers, suggesting that speaker-dependent variation is encoded by listeners and affects word recognition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%