2016
DOI: 10.21529/recadm.2016010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tales of the socio-past organizing in a Brazilian patent of biotechnology

Abstract: Editor responsável pela submissão:Diego Maganhotto Coraiola. Artigo analisado via processo de revisão duplo cego (Double-blind).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, other works draw on the historical perspective to discuss and to remount several events and practices in the context of the history of educational institutions (Alcadipani & Bertero, 2014;Barros, 2014Barros, , 2017Barros, Alcadipani, & Bertero, 2018;Fernandes, Bezerra, & Ipiranga, 2015); the potential of history for professional career analysis (Closs & Rocha-de-Olivera, 2015); the relationship of companies with the issue of the Brazilian dictatorship in memory spaces creations (Costa, Silva, & Monteiro, 2016;Trindade & Costa, 2017); museums (Costa, Mancebo, & Pessoa, 2016) and the intersection with human rights (Costa & Silva, 2018); how memory and history are appropriated by advertising discourse (Costa & Pessoa, 2016); the discussion on the ANTi-History approach (Ipiranga, Chaym, & Sousa, 2016a, 2016bQuelha-de-Sá & Costa, 2018); the role of history in the construction of organizational memory (Perdigão, Barros, Carrieri, & Miranda, 2015), and in presenting the association with the construction of practices in organizing the city (Lopes & Ipiranga, 2017).…”
Section: Historical Research In Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, other works draw on the historical perspective to discuss and to remount several events and practices in the context of the history of educational institutions (Alcadipani & Bertero, 2014;Barros, 2014Barros, , 2017Barros, Alcadipani, & Bertero, 2018;Fernandes, Bezerra, & Ipiranga, 2015); the potential of history for professional career analysis (Closs & Rocha-de-Olivera, 2015); the relationship of companies with the issue of the Brazilian dictatorship in memory spaces creations (Costa, Silva, & Monteiro, 2016;Trindade & Costa, 2017); museums (Costa, Mancebo, & Pessoa, 2016) and the intersection with human rights (Costa & Silva, 2018); how memory and history are appropriated by advertising discourse (Costa & Pessoa, 2016); the discussion on the ANTi-History approach (Ipiranga, Chaym, & Sousa, 2016a, 2016bQuelha-de-Sá & Costa, 2018); the role of history in the construction of organizational memory (Perdigão, Barros, Carrieri, & Miranda, 2015), and in presenting the association with the construction of practices in organizing the city (Lopes & Ipiranga, 2017).…”
Section: Historical Research In Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, other works draw on the historical perspective to discuss and to remount several events and practices in the context of the history of educational institutions (Alcadipani & Bertero, 2014;Barros, 2014Barros, , 2017Barros, Alcadipani, & Bertero, 2018;Fernandes, Bezerra, & Ipiranga, 2015); the potential of history for professional career analysis (Closs & Rocha-de-Olivera, 2015); the relationship of companies with the issue of the Brazilian dictatorship in memory spaces creations (Costa, Silva, & Monteiro, 2016;Trindade & Costa, 2017); museums (Costa, Mancebo, & Pessoa, 2016) and the intersection with human rights (Costa & Silva, 2018); how memory and history are appropriated by advertising discourse (Costa & Pessoa, 2016); the discussion on the ANTi-History approach (Ipiranga, Chaym, & Sousa, 2016a, 2016bQuelha-de-Sá & Costa, 2018); the role of history in the construction of organizational memory (Perdigão, Barros, Carrieri, & Miranda, 2015), and in presenting the association with the construction of practices in organizing the city (Lopes & Ipiranga, 2017).…”
Section: Historical Research In Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%