2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00011-004-0365-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival chances and psychological aspects of quality of life in patients with localized early stage breast cancer

Abstract: Our results show that physicians have to realise although their early breast cancer patients have excellent survival chances, psychological distress is present. From a clinical perspective we would recommend that early stage breast cancer patients, and especially patients with occult, pT1a,b tumours be informed about their excellent prognosis. In addition, cognitive therapy might help patients stop worrying about their cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, increased rurality was associated with reports of lower overall well‐being, lower functional well‐being (eg, ability to work, enjoyment of life, acceptance of illness), and increased concerns about breast cancer specific symptoms (eg, hair loss, weight change, lymphedema) at 1 month following treatment completion. These findings are consistent with prior research reporting lower QOL among rural dwelling breast cancer survivors, 6 and they suggest that characteristics of the communities to which patients return can have an effect on QOL outcomes. However, while providing preliminary indications that rural residence may be associated with lower QOL in some domains, this study also highlights the fact that individual variables, such as willingness to seek social support, may be even more central to early QOL outcomes experienced by breast cancer survivors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, increased rurality was associated with reports of lower overall well‐being, lower functional well‐being (eg, ability to work, enjoyment of life, acceptance of illness), and increased concerns about breast cancer specific symptoms (eg, hair loss, weight change, lymphedema) at 1 month following treatment completion. These findings are consistent with prior research reporting lower QOL among rural dwelling breast cancer survivors, 6 and they suggest that characteristics of the communities to which patients return can have an effect on QOL outcomes. However, while providing preliminary indications that rural residence may be associated with lower QOL in some domains, this study also highlights the fact that individual variables, such as willingness to seek social support, may be even more central to early QOL outcomes experienced by breast cancer survivors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…4 Among rural women living with cancer, high levels of depression and hopelessness/helplessness have been noted. 5 Rural women living with cancer report lower than average quality of life (QOL) 6 and may have particular concerns about being stigmatized within their communities as a result of their cancer diagnosis. 7 One way in which rural and urban areas may differ is in the availability of community-based social support.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with this outcome, Koopman et al ([41]; N ¼ 100) found that a large majority of rural breast cancer survivors in their sample considered their diagnosis to be one of their most stressful life events, reported relatively high levels of helplessness/hopelessness, and some met the criteria for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Similarly, Albert et al's ( [42]; N ¼ 269) quantitative-survey findings showed that rural breast cancer survivors had a relatively low level of quality of life when they were discharged from the hospital. Although the levels of quality of life for rural breast cancer survivors tended to improve over a 12-month period, these levels remained below the population average.…”
Section: The Implications Of Lack Of Health Informationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Embora o R24h, quando comparado aos questionários de freqüência alimentar (QFA), possa não ser a ferramenta mais adequada para avaliar o consumo de micronutrientes, o R24h mostrou-se adequado aos objetivos deste estudo. Portanto, não há o melhor método de consumo, mas sim o mais adequado a uma situação específica 37 , pois a verdadeira ingestão de alimentos e nutrientes constitui uma variável latente, cujos resultados não podem ser considerados livres de erros 38 .…”
Section: I S C U S S ã Ounclassified