A trio of genes might potentially distinguish doxorubicin-responsive from nonresponsive tumors, but further validation by a larger number of samples is still needed.

An increasing number of studies have shown altered expression of secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) and N-myc down-regulated gene (NDRG1) in several malignancies, including breast carcinoma; however, the role of these potential biomarkers in tumor development and progression is controversial. In this study, NDRG1 and SPARC protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays containing breast tumor specimens from patients with 10 years of follow-up. NDRG1 and SPARC protein expression was determined in 596 patients along with other prognostic markers, such as ER, PR, and HER2. The status of NDRG1 and SPARC protein expression was correlated with prognostic variables and patient clinical outcome. Immunostaining revealed that 272 of the 596 cases (45.6%) were positive for NDRG1 and 431 (72.3%) were positive for SPARC. Statistically significant differences were found between the presence of SPARC and NDRG1 protein expression and standard clinicopathological variables. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that NDRG1 positivity was directly associated with shorter disease-free survival (DFS, P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS, P < 0.001). In contrast, patients expressing low levels of SPARC protein had worse DFS (P = 0.001) and OS (P = 0.001) compared to those expressing high levels. Combined analysis of the two markers indicated that DFS (P < 0.001) and OS rates (P < 0.001) were lowest for patients with NDRG1-positive and SPARC-negative tumors. Furthermore, NDRG1 over-expression and SPARC down-regulation correlated with poor prognosis in patients with luminal A or triple-negative subtype breast cancer. On multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model, NDRG1 and SPARC protein expression were independent prognostic factors for both DFS and OS of breast cancer patients. These data indicate that NDRG1 over-expression and SPARC down-regulation could play important roles in breast cancer progression and serve as useful biomarkers to better define breast cancer prognosis.

In a previous study, using differential display reverse transcriptase-PCR (DDRT-PCR) we showed that down-regulation of the PHLDA1 (pleckstrin homology-like domain, family A, member 1; also named TDAG51) mRNA was down-regulated in breast tumors compared with normal breast tissue. The present study was conducted to determine the expression pattern and predictive prognostic value of PHLDA1 in breast cancer. A series of 720 primary invasive breast tumors were examined for PHLDA1 expression. PHLDA1 mRNA expression was determined in 74 breast tumors using quantitative Real Time PCR analysis (qPCR). PHLDA1 protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using Tissue Microarrays (TMA) containing 699 primary invasive breast tumors. Reduced PHLDA1 mRNA expression was identified in 72% (53/74) of the primary breast tumors analyzed. Seventy-three percent (512/699) of cases analyzed showed negative PHLDA1 protein expression. Down-regulation of PHLDA1 protein was a strong predictor of poor prognosis for breast cancer patients. Breast cancer patients with tumors that were negative for PHLDA1 protein expression had shorter disease free survival (P < 0.001) and overall survival (P < 0.001) than patients with tumors that were positive for PHLDA1 protein expression. In addition patients with tumors exhibiting reduced PHLDA1 expression and paucity for ER had the worse outcome (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that PHLDA1 protein expression is an independent prognostic factor of patient survival. To our knowledge, the expression pattern of PHLDA1 in breast cancer has not previously been investigated. Our results provide strong evidence that reduced PHLDA1 expression is important in breast cancer progression and could serve as useful prognostic marker of disease outcome.

We employ Fourier-transform Raman spectroscopy to study normal and tumoral human breast tissues, including several subtypes of cancers. We analyzed 194 Raman spectra from breast tissues that were separated into 9 groups according to their corresponding histopathological diagnosis. The assignment of the relevant Raman bands enabled us to connect the several kinds of breast tissues (normal and pathological) to their corresponding biochemical moieties alterations and distinguish among 7 groups: normal breast, fibrocystic condition, duct carcinoma in situ, duct carcinoma in situ with necrosis, infiltrating duct carcinoma not otherwise specified, colloid infiltrating duct carcinoma, and invasive lobular carcinomas. We were able to establish the biochemical basis for each spectrum, relating the observed peaks to specific biomolecules that play a special role in the carcinogenesis process. This work is very useful for the premature optical diagnosis of a broad range of breast pathologies. We noticed that we were not able to differentiate inflammatory and medullary duct carcinomas from infiltrating duct carcinoma not otherwise specified.

Although epidemiologic studies have shown an inverse association between isoflavones and breast cancer risk, little evidence for a dose-response relation is available. We conducted hospital-based case-control studies of patients aged 20-74 years with primary, incident, histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer, and matched controls from medical checkup examinees in Nagano, Japan and from cancer-free patients in São Paulo, Brazil. A total of 850 pairs (390 Japanese, 81 Japanese Brazilians and 379 non-Japanese Brazilians) completed validated food frequency questionnaires. The odds ratio of breast cancer according to isoflavone intake was estimated using a conditional logistic regression model. We found a statistically significant inverse association between isoflavone intake and the risk of breast cancer for Japanese Brazilians and non-Japanese Brazilians. For Japanese, a non-significant inverse association was limited to postmenopausal women. In the three populations combined, breast cancer risk linearly decreased from 'no' to 'moderate' isoflavone intake and thereafter leveled off. Compared to non-consumers, adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for consumers in increasing quintile intake categories (median intake in each category: 8.7, 23.1, 33.8, 45.7, and 71.3 mg/day) were 0.69 (0.44-1.09), 0.54 (0.31-0.94), 0.45 (0.26-0.77), 0.34 (0.19-0.62), and 0.43 (0.24-0.76), respectively. Overall, we found an inverse association between dietary isoflavone intake and risk of breast cancer. Our finding suggests a risk-reducing rather than risk-enhancing effect of isoflavones on breast cancer within the range achievable from dietary intake alone. In addition, women may benefit from risk reduction if they consume at least moderate amounts of isoflavones.