2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2006.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting content scheduling on situated public displays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years a trend towards largescale deployments with a mixture of centralised and distributed components is increasingly common [22,20]. The e-Campus [22] deployment provided an early example with approximately twenty-five screens deployed on the Lancaster University campus. Scheduling control was partially provided by a centralised service but also distributed to the display nodes themselves, allowing them to also accept scheduling requests from other services.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years a trend towards largescale deployments with a mixture of centralised and distributed components is increasingly common [22,20]. The e-Campus [22] deployment provided an early example with approximately twenty-five screens deployed on the Lancaster University campus. Scheduling control was partially provided by a centralised service but also distributed to the display nodes themselves, allowing them to also accept scheduling requests from other services.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, although commercial signage systems have evolved to incorporate conditional statements and constraints, such systems typically feature sophisticated user interfaces that may be overly cumbersome for non-expert users. Similarly, research platforms such as e-Campus have provided constraint-based scheduling for expert users (in this case, taking the form of an API for Python programming [83]), but the subsequent user interfaces have abstracted away much of this fine-grained control [35].…”
Section: Context and Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…primarily researchers, but also members of staff, and students) to create applications that can control the presentation of content on the e-Campus displays. The software infrastructure is divided into two parts: a low-level software infrastructure and API [25] that offers precise and immediate control over the presentation of content on the e-Campus displays; and a high-level, constraintbased scheduling service and API that offers an easy-to-use mechanism for requesting content to be shown based on the specification of constraints.…”
Section: Software Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%