Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2632048.2636080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mercury

Abstract: As the cost of display hardware falls so the number of public display networks being deployed is increasing rapidly. While these networks have traditionally taken the form of digital signage used for advertising and information there is increasing interest in the vision of "open display networks" [8]. A key component of any open display network is an effective channel for disseminating applications created by third-parties and recent research has proposed a display-oriented "application store" as one such chan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, whilst in our setting users reported that it was a single Channel (Bus Departures) that led them to want to use Tacita, and on average our users selected a small number of the available Tacita Channels, it is entirely possible that in other settings it would be the cumulative value of lots of smaller applications that prompt users to value personalised pervasive displays. In both cases, there is benefit in encouraging higher levels of innovation in display application development, as seen in initiatives for the creation of display application stores [12]. What happens if multiple people try and personalise the same display?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, whilst in our setting users reported that it was a single Channel (Bus Departures) that led them to want to use Tacita, and on average our users selected a small number of the available Tacita Channels, it is entirely possible that in other settings it would be the cumulative value of lots of smaller applications that prompt users to value personalised pervasive displays. In both cases, there is benefit in encouraging higher levels of innovation in display application development, as seen in initiatives for the creation of display application stores [12]. What happens if multiple people try and personalise the same display?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, the displays show a mix of static content (such as slides with departmental or university-wide news), videos, and websites specifically developed to deliver content for public displays. The display schedule and content can be configured by screen owners and content creators through a set of web-based user interfaces (e-Channels [20] and the Mercury App Store [12]). Display nodes run Yarely, a digital signage player that retrieves display schedules from backend services in the form of Content Descriptor Sets (CDSs), an XML-based format describing content items and their scheduling constraints (e.g.…”
Section: Deployment Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%