1996
DOI: 10.1002/jhrc.1240191112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supercritical fluid extraction employing a variable restrictor coupled to gas chromatography via a sample pre‐concentration trap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Burford et al reviewed the instrumentation and applications of online SFE/GC [65]. Two studies looked at the use of cryogenic analyte preconcentration future science group traps prior to SFE-GC [63,66]. Meanwhile, Lou et al compared the chromatographic performance of split/splitless and programmed temperature, vaporizer injection methods in directly coupled SFE-GC [67].…”
Section: Sfe-coupled Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burford et al reviewed the instrumentation and applications of online SFE/GC [65]. Two studies looked at the use of cryogenic analyte preconcentration future science group traps prior to SFE-GC [63,66]. Meanwhile, Lou et al compared the chromatographic performance of split/splitless and programmed temperature, vaporizer injection methods in directly coupled SFE-GC [67].…”
Section: Sfe-coupled Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burford et al reviewed the instrumentation and applications of on-line SFE/GC (258). Two studies looked at the use of cryogenic analyte preconcentration traps prior to SFE/GC (259,260). Meanwhile, Lou et al compared the chromatographic performance of split/splitless and programmedtemperature, vaporizer injection methods in directly coupled SFE/ GC (261).…”
Section: Supercritical Fluid Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysts have generally taken one of three approaches. Some researchers have made use of external traps as an interface between the two systems. These traps often have larger active cross sections than open tubular columns which result in lower linear velocities. If packed with sorbent, a lower phase ratio is possible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%