2016
DOI: 10.4103/2278-0513.197869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of cervical cytology and its correlation with clinical and histopathological findings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

17
10
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
17
10
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[1] In the present study, the mean age of cases of malignant cervical lesions was 53.9 years (SD±11.28) while for premalignant lesions was 40 years (SD±10.83). This study is in concordance with a previous study from India which has observed the mean age of incidence of cervical pre malignant and malignant lesions to be 39 years and 49 years with an age range of 31-40 years and 41-60 years respectively [7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…[1] In the present study, the mean age of cases of malignant cervical lesions was 53.9 years (SD±11.28) while for premalignant lesions was 40 years (SD±10.83). This study is in concordance with a previous study from India which has observed the mean age of incidence of cervical pre malignant and malignant lesions to be 39 years and 49 years with an age range of 31-40 years and 41-60 years respectively [7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In this category, the smears included were those who were scanty in cell population according to Bethesda system 2014, smears obscured by in lammatory exudates, blood or mucin >75% area. Our result was comparable to result by (Bamanikar et al, 2016) and (Sachan et al, 2018) who reported the inadequacy rate as 5.99% and 6.42% respec- 4641(95.35) 4 (30.77) 1 (10) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0.00 ASC-US 61 (2.33) 3 (23.07) 2 (20) 0 (0) 0 (0) ASC-H (5) 0 (0) 1 (7.7) 1 (10) 2 (33.33) 1 (5) LSIL 81 (2.33) 4(30.77) 2 (20) 1 (16.67) 0 (0) HSIL (10) 0 (0) 1 (7.7) 4 (40) 3 (50) 2 (10) IC 170 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 17 (85) Total (92) 43 13 10 6 20 tively. In contrast, the inadequacy rate by (Kothari et al, 2014) was low-1.09% and that by (Warpe et al, 2016) was little higher than us -7.43%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This was in accordance with other studies in literature. 18,19 Bamanikar et al 20 observed that among 3337 cases reported as NILM, 2111 cases were found normal. Among infectious category, nonspecific inflammation was most common finding (877 cases, 26.28% of all NILM cases).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%