Dear Sir:Despite the findings of Graham and Statham [4] and Fallow and Tucker [3] that fluorescent-brightened wool is much more susceptible to sunlight yellowing than unbrightened wool, fluorescent brighteners [6] are still widely used during the processing of wool intended for sale in white or pastel shades. The high level of whiteness that current fashion demands seems to be obtainable only by the use of brighteners. It is, therefore, highly desirable to discover new brighteners having superior lightfastness, when applied to wool, than the brighteners presently available. In the meantime, alternative means to improve the lightfastness of brightened wool must be devised. ' The yellowing of brightened wool is a more complex phenomenon than the yellowing of unbrightened wool, owing to the extra discoloration arising from photodecomposition of brightener or photosensitization of wool by brightener. An investigation into the problem has commenced in these laboratories, and initial findings are now reported. These mainly confirm and extend the work of previous investigators [3,4,5].. -An attempt was first made to compare 20 of the various brighteners currently available with respect to lightfastness, when applied to wool, and to find which particular chemical class of brightener is more suitable for application to wool. Information as to the exact structure of a brightener was not always available from the manufacturer, but we were usually informed of the class [9, 10] to which the brightener belonged, such as stilbene, coumarin, or pyrazoline. Stilbenes could also be recognized by the rapid changes, due to cis-trans isomerization, in the uv absorption spectrum, which occurred when an aqueous solution was exposed to diffuse daylight [12]. Brighteners are usually exhausted onto wool (J-1 hr) at pH values of 4-5 and temperatures between 40 and 95°C, at a level of 0.1-1.0% on the weight of wool. Added sodium hydrosulfite or sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate (2-3 g/liter) acts as a reductive bleach with respect to the color normally present in natural wool [2,11]. As a general rule, stilbenes a appeared to require a higher level (ca. 1%) and higher temperature of application (80-95° ) than coumarins or pyrazolines (ca. 0.2%, 40-60° ). Both the initial whiteness and subsequent lightfastness of a brightener can vary considerably, according to the conditions of application and/or irradiation [1,14]. A thorough investigation of the relative merits of brighteners would have entailed an enormous number of tests, and this was not carried out. Instead, each brightener was merely applied in accordance with the recommendations of the supplier. Under these conditions, three brighteners, which seemed to be all stilbenes, performed reasonably well. These were Leucophor PAF (Sandoz), Photine HV (Hickson and Welch), and Lumicol WFG (origin unknown, supplied by Edgar