2013
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static and Dynamic Stability of Elastomeric Bearings for Seismic Protection of Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, several papers on stability problems, also very recent (Buckle et al 2002;Warn and Weisman 2011;Weisman and Warn 2012;Sanchez et al 2013;Masroor et al 2012;Han et al 2013), refer to rubber bearings with very low values of both S 1 and S 2 (S 1 = 5.5-10; S 2 = 1.8-2.5), which seem neither realistic nor feasible in actual design solutions; further the importance of S 2 in affecting the stability of the bearings is not specifically addressed: as a matter of fact, the value of S 2 for the tested/analyzed bearings is not explicitly given in the papers and is not accounted for in the interpretation and discussion of the experimental and numerical outcomes.…”
Section: Values Of S 1 and S 2 In Rbs (And Related Research)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, several papers on stability problems, also very recent (Buckle et al 2002;Warn and Weisman 2011;Weisman and Warn 2012;Sanchez et al 2013;Masroor et al 2012;Han et al 2013), refer to rubber bearings with very low values of both S 1 and S 2 (S 1 = 5.5-10; S 2 = 1.8-2.5), which seem neither realistic nor feasible in actual design solutions; further the importance of S 2 in affecting the stability of the bearings is not specifically addressed: as a matter of fact, the value of S 2 for the tested/analyzed bearings is not explicitly given in the papers and is not accounted for in the interpretation and discussion of the experimental and numerical outcomes.…”
Section: Values Of S 1 and S 2 In Rbs (And Related Research)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the influence of S 1 on the buckling capacity has been recognized and widely studied both experimentally and numerically (Buckle and Liu 1994;Takayama and Morita 2012;Han et al 2013;Sanchez et al 2013;Weisman and Warn 2012;Warn and Weisman 2011), the effect of S 2 has not been comparably explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A model that includes the influence of vertical load on the effective horizontal stiffness and lead-core yield strength was developed by Ryan et al [35] and has been implemented in OpenSees [26]. Models that account for the second-order effects due to vertical load at large horizontal displacement have been developed [36][37][38] and are capable of exhibiting zero or negative tangential horizontal stiffness as has been experimentally demonstrated [39]. However, these models have not been widely adopted due to the extensive experimental data required to calibrate the model parameters.…”
Section: Lead-rubber Bearingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study an enhanced 81 analytical model is developed based on the nonlinear model developed by Nagarajaiah and Ferrell (1999) 82 and its effectiveness in predicting the dynamic response of elastomeric bearings is evaluated and verified 83 using experimental data from the study by Sanchez et al (2012). The key contribution of this study is to 84 develop a detailed analytical model that is capable of modeling the nonlinear response of elastomeric 85 bearings under extreme loads, including the capability to more accurately capture its dependence on 86 horizontal displacement and axial loads at displacements exceeding the stability limit.…”
Section: Validated and Verified Their 40mentioning
confidence: 99%