2017
DOI: 10.1109/tsm.2017.2718029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable, Reliable, and Bit-Interleaving 12T SRAM for Space Applications: A Device Circuit Co-Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the WWL12T/D12T cell consumes higher area 1.06 × /1.04 × when compared to WALP11T due to the presence of an additional NMOS transistor. Table 1 reports the comparison of the proposed WALP11T cell, in terms of major design metrics, with the previously proposed FD8T [11], BI11T [12], SEDF9T [15], WWL12T [23] and D12T [24] cells as well as additional state-of-the-art SRAM cells such as transmission-gate based 9T (TG9T) [32], power-gated 9T (PG9T) [33], differential writing 10T (10T-P1) [34] and feedback-cutting 11T (FC11T) [35] at V DD = 0.3 V. As is evident, the WALP11T cell shows shorter T RA than most other cells used in this work. However, the FD8T shows shorter T RA than the proposed cell due to its higher β-ratio and its structural similarity to the conventional 6T cell.…”
Section: Layout Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, the WWL12T/D12T cell consumes higher area 1.06 × /1.04 × when compared to WALP11T due to the presence of an additional NMOS transistor. Table 1 reports the comparison of the proposed WALP11T cell, in terms of major design metrics, with the previously proposed FD8T [11], BI11T [12], SEDF9T [15], WWL12T [23] and D12T [24] cells as well as additional state-of-the-art SRAM cells such as transmission-gate based 9T (TG9T) [32], power-gated 9T (PG9T) [33], differential writing 10T (10T-P1) [34] and feedback-cutting 11T (FC11T) [35] at V DD = 0.3 V. As is evident, the WALP11T cell shows shorter T RA than most other cells used in this work. However, the FD8T shows shorter T RA than the proposed cell due to its higher β-ratio and its structural similarity to the conventional 6T cell.…”
Section: Layout Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 reports the comparison of the proposed WALP11T cell, in terms of major design metrics, with the previously proposed FD8T [11], BI11T [12], SEDF9T [15], WWL12T [23] and D12T [24] cells as well as additional state‐of‐the‐art SRAM cells such as transmission‐gate based 9T (TG9T) [32], power‐gated 9T (PG9T) [33], differential writing 10T (10T‐P1) [34] and feedback‐cutting 11T (FC11T) [35] at VDD=0.3thinmathspacenormalV. As is evident, the WALP11T cell shows shorter TRA than most other cells used in this work.…”
Section: Comparison Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Radiation hardening by design (RHBD) is one of the most effective techniques to mitigate soft errors. In the last decade, researchers have mostly focused on the radiation hardening for memory cells [4,5], flip-flops [6,7] and latches [1,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] using RHBD techniques like multiplemodular redundancy, temporal redundancy, and so on. This paper mainly focuses on these latch designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mitigate SNUs, DNUs, TNUs, and/or SETs, by means of radiation-hardening-by-design (RHBD) approaches, many hardened storage cells such as static random access memories (SRAMs) [9][10][11][12], flip-flops [13][14][15][16], and latches [5][6][7][8][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], have been proposed. This paper focuses on latches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%