2021
DOI: 10.1109/tetc.2018.2871861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Low Cost, Double-and-Triple-Node-Upset-Tolerant Latch Designs for Nano-scale CMOS

Abstract: This paper presents two novel low cost, double-and-triple-node-upset tolerant latch designs. First, a novel low cost and double-node-upset (DNU) completely tolerant (LCDNUT) latch design is proposed. The latch mainly comprises a storage module (SM) feeding back to a 3-input C-element. The SM mainly consists of eight input-split inverters. Since the inputs of the C-element cannot be simultaneously flipped, the latch tolerates any DNU in the SM. When a single node in the SM and the output node are affected, the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To make a fair comparison with the state-of-the-art typical SRAM cells, such as the 6T, ST10T [4], NASA13T [6], NS10T [7], RHD12T [8], RSP14T [9], RH12T [10] and DNUSRM [11], the same simulation conditions described in the above section were used for SRAM implementations. Table I shows the reliability and overhead comparison results among the unhardened/hardened SRAMs in terms of SNU recoverability, DNU recoverability, write access time (WAT), read access time (RAT), average power dissipation (dynamic and static), and silicon area which is measured with the method in [22].…”
Section: Comparison and Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To make a fair comparison with the state-of-the-art typical SRAM cells, such as the 6T, ST10T [4], NASA13T [6], NS10T [7], RHD12T [8], RSP14T [9], RH12T [10] and DNUSRM [11], the same simulation conditions described in the above section were used for SRAM implementations. Table I shows the reliability and overhead comparison results among the unhardened/hardened SRAMs in terms of SNU recoverability, DNU recoverability, write access time (WAT), read access time (RAT), average power dissipation (dynamic and static), and silicon area which is measured with the method in [22].…”
Section: Comparison and Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is reported in [22] that process, voltage and temperature (PVT) variations have increasing impacts on storage cells. It is reported in [9] that static noise margin (SNM)…”
Section: Comparison and Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify various overhead of the proposed SCCS cell to make a fair comparison with the state-of-the-art typical SRAM cells described in Section I, the same simulation conditions described in the above section were used for all simulations. Table I shows the reliability and overhead comparison results among the unhardened/hardened SRAM cells in terms of SNU/DNU hardness, write access time (WAT), read access time (RAT), average power dissipation (dynamic and static), and silicon area measured with the method in [27].…”
Section: Comparison and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, scaling VDD and the technology nodes induces large process variations [34]- [35], soft errors [36], and manufacturing defects [37] that affect the sensing operation. In this regard, offset cancellation [14]- [15], upset tolerant [38]- [39], and defect tolerant [13] techniques are required to satisfy the stable sensing operation. Among these techniques, this paper focuses on the offset cancellation technique for process variation tolerance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%