2001
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-58-5-870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable nitrogen isotopes as indicators of anthropogenic activities in small freshwater systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
73
3
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
73
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The d 15 N signature of consumer taxa positively covaries with total N-loading from anthropogenic sources (Cabana and Rasmussen 1994;Lake et al 2001). It is likely that much of the unexplained variance in the invertebrate time series data arises from the role of point (e.g., municipal or industrial outfalls) and non-point (e.g., agricultural runoff, land use changes) sources that modulate local nutrient concentrations in eutrophic ecosystems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The d 15 N signature of consumer taxa positively covaries with total N-loading from anthropogenic sources (Cabana and Rasmussen 1994;Lake et al 2001). It is likely that much of the unexplained variance in the invertebrate time series data arises from the role of point (e.g., municipal or industrial outfalls) and non-point (e.g., agricultural runoff, land use changes) sources that modulate local nutrient concentrations in eutrophic ecosystems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of anthropogenic pollution in aquatic ecosystems with δ 15 N isotopic method has mostly been concentrated on plants, sediment, invertebrates, and fishes as biological indicators (McKinney et al 2002;Cole et al 2004;Xu et al 2005a, b;Lake et al 2001;Schlacher et al 2005). Generally, tissue turnover rates of mussels are slower than algae, macrophytes, and small invertebrates, which suggests that δ 15 N of mussels are less fluctuating over time than small primary producers and consumers and thus integrate waste inputs over long time periods and provide assessment of better precision (Cabana and Rasmussen 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences could reflect lower isotopic heterogeneity at the moulting site of Karsibor birds. Isotope signatures can vary over small spatial scales due to processes like microbial degradation and methantrophy, or localised eutrophication, particularly in freshwater wetlands (Hornibrook et al 2000;Rice 2000;Lake et al 2001).…”
Section: Between-site Differences In Mean Isotopic Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%