2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.03.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spherical indentation response of metallic glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
84
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
8
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen in Fig. 2, the curve from D-P criterion prediction is close to that by the M-C criterion in most regime of the normal stress, which explains why both criteria can capture the deformation of metallic glasses in certain boundary-value problems [21][22][23][24]. The D-P and M-C values are very consistent with Lewandowiski's report [3] using superimposed method.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As seen in Fig. 2, the curve from D-P criterion prediction is close to that by the M-C criterion in most regime of the normal stress, which explains why both criteria can capture the deformation of metallic glasses in certain boundary-value problems [21][22][23][24]. The D-P and M-C values are very consistent with Lewandowiski's report [3] using superimposed method.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…We hence use the term ''failure" instead of ''yielding" to describe the critical combinations of shear and normal stress which trigger fracture in Zr 41 Ti 14 Cu 12.5 Ni 10 Be 22.5 . It is noted that there could be possibilities when shear banding does not lead to catastrophic failure, for example in bending tests [37] and in indentation experiments [21][22][23][24]. In those states of stress, ''yielding" apparently differs from ''failure".…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, very little is known about this phenomenon for cohesive-frictional materials. Giannakopoulos and Larsson [6] and Vaidyanathan et al [7] studied the pyramidal indentation of cohesive-frictional materials using the finite element method and, more recently, Narasimhan [8] and Patnaik et al [9] analysed the applicability of the expanding cavity model [10,11] to studying the conical and spherical indentation response of elasto-plastic materials in which the flow stress depends on the hydrostatic pressure. However, none of these studies focused on the determination of the constitutive response of the material from the indentation curve, and there is no reliable methodology for estimating the yield stress and pressure sensitivity in amorphous materials from instrumented indentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%