2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the mechanical properties of amorphous materials through instrumented nanoindentation

Abstract: A novel methodology based on instrumented indentation is developed to determine the mechanical properties of amorphous materials which present cohesive-frictional behaviour. The approach is based on the concept of a universal hardness equation, which results from the assumption of a characteristic indentation pressure proportional to the hardness. The actual universal hardness equation is obtained from a detailed finite element analysis of the process of sharp indentation for a very wide range of material prop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent progress in instrumented nanoindentation has opened the possibility of carrying out nanoindentation tests at high temperatures [15]. Nevertheless, it is not easy to obtain the constitutive mechanical properties from nanoindentation tests because of the complex stress state below the indenter, despite the large body of literature on the so-called inverse problem of instrumented indentation [16][17][18]. As a result, current knowledge about the effect of temperature on the mechanical properties of nanoscale multilayers is scarce [15,[19][20][21], This information is not only important from the engineering viewpoint, but also from the fundamental perspective, as the dominant mechanisms controlling the deformation and fracture of nanoscale multilayers (interface strength, dislocation plasticity) are often thermally activated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent progress in instrumented nanoindentation has opened the possibility of carrying out nanoindentation tests at high temperatures [15]. Nevertheless, it is not easy to obtain the constitutive mechanical properties from nanoindentation tests because of the complex stress state below the indenter, despite the large body of literature on the so-called inverse problem of instrumented indentation [16][17][18]. As a result, current knowledge about the effect of temperature on the mechanical properties of nanoscale multilayers is scarce [15,[19][20][21], This information is not only important from the engineering viewpoint, but also from the fundamental perspective, as the dominant mechanisms controlling the deformation and fracture of nanoscale multilayers (interface strength, dislocation plasticity) are often thermally activated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the hardness-compression strength factor established by Rodríguez et al [28], the results indicate an increase in the compression strength of the nanocomposite. Moreover, the compression modulus also shows an increase of 11%, with the incorporation of CNTs ( Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Despite the approximations given by the utilized approach (Oliver and Pharr, 1992), experimental results have been successfully reproduced by material point method (MPM) simulations. Unlike previous publications that mostly deal either with the nanoindentation of homogeneous amorphous materials (Rodríguez et al, 2012) or with the effect of the substrate during the tests (Nunes and Piedade, 2013), the present work clarifies the relationship between the mechanical properties obtained by indentation and the morphology of graded polymer composites, constituting a useful tool for a smarter design of functionally graded nanocomposites FIGURE 1 | For a given average particle volume fraction ϕ ϕ ϕ and a given indentation load (micro and nano), which composite (homogeneous particle fraction, H, or graded particle fraction, G) is the hardest?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although challenging, the extraction of material properties by this method has been successfully carried out for macroscopically homogeneous samples, such as polycrystalline solids (Dao et al, 2001), amorphous solids (Rodríguez et al, 2012), and even nanocomposite structures (Penumadu et al, 2011;Díez-Pascual et al, 2015). On the contrary, less attention has been paid to the analysis of graded structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%