2021
DOI: 10.3390/toxics9120352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatially and Temporally Resolved Ambient PM2.5 in Relation to Preterm Birth

Abstract: Growing evidence suggests that maternal exposure to ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) during pregnancy is associated with preterm birth; however, few studies have examined critical windows of exposure, which can help elucidate underlying biologic mechanisms and inform public health messaging for limiting exposure. Participants included 891 mother–newborn pairs enrolled in a U.S.-based pregnancy cohort study. Daily residential PM2.5 concentrations at a 1 × 1 km2 resolution were estimated using a satellite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,19,20,23 The models used in these analyses have been well-validated and used in previous epidemiologic studies of birth outcomes. [25][26][27] We acknowledge certain limitations in our study that may affect inference or interpretability. We assigned exposure to three criteria air pollutants based on census tract of residence at birth, which may result in exposure misclassification if gestational parents spent a substantial amount of time outside of their home and outside of their census tract.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4,19,20,23 The models used in these analyses have been well-validated and used in previous epidemiologic studies of birth outcomes. [25][26][27] We acknowledge certain limitations in our study that may affect inference or interpretability. We assigned exposure to three criteria air pollutants based on census tract of residence at birth, which may result in exposure misclassification if gestational parents spent a substantial amount of time outside of their home and outside of their census tract.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…4,19,20,23 The models used in these analyses have been well-validated and used in previous epidemiologic studies of birth outcomes. 25–27…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study conducted by Sagiv et al. in Pennsylvania during 1997–2001 found an acute effect of exposure to PM 10 in two days and five days before delivery on the risk of PTB with no statistically significant difference [ 18 ], in addition, some studies have found PTB were positive related with air pollution, while the effects were no statistically significant [ 19 , 21 , 31 , 32 ]. This may be related to the low level of air pollution in the study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear regression model for compositions is a close analog to the classical multivariate linear regression model; the main difference is that the compositional model simultaneously analyzes the six cell-type proportions as a single multivariate outcome, through an isometric log-ratio transformation. Previous research has demonstrated the potential differential effects of air pollution by fetal sex and trimester of exposure [ 11 , 35 37 ]. Therefore, we fitted an “overall” model that included all participants and separate models stratifying by child sex.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Placental molecular marks including DNA methylation have been proposed as a mechanism linking PM 2.5 to fetal growth [ 7 10 ]. Importantly, evidence from multiple studies suggest that the effects of exposure to air pollution can differ based on timing of exposure, with certain gestational weeks showing stronger associations than other time periods in gestation [ 8 , 11 , 12 ]. Additionally, fetal sex plays a crucial role, as evidenced by studies documenting sex-specific associations between air pollution and anthropometric and developmental outcomes in offspring [ 13 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%