2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and temporal taphonomic study of bone accumulations of the burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) in central Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
60

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
60
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the fact that other sympatric owls show similar general taphonomic trends, the features observed in barn owl pellet‐derived small mammal bone and tooth accumulations indicate – as corroborated by Comay and Dayan (2018b) – that the barn owl is the bird of prey that least modifies its prey bones and teeth in the Monte Desert of central western Argentina, both in intensity and degree. Thus, modern small mammal bone and tooth accumulations generated from pellets of sympatric owls like the Great Horned Owl Bubo virginianus magellanicus (Montalvo et al ., 2016), S. chacoensis (López et al ., 2018) and A. cunicularia (Montalvo et al ., 2020) show a higher degree and proportion of digested elements, a higher proportion of breakage on cranial and postcranial elements, lower relative abundance of skeletal elements indicating greater bone loss, and lower preservation of articulated elements, amongst other taphonomic results, than barn owl pellet‐derived small mammal accumulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Despite the fact that other sympatric owls show similar general taphonomic trends, the features observed in barn owl pellet‐derived small mammal bone and tooth accumulations indicate – as corroborated by Comay and Dayan (2018b) – that the barn owl is the bird of prey that least modifies its prey bones and teeth in the Monte Desert of central western Argentina, both in intensity and degree. Thus, modern small mammal bone and tooth accumulations generated from pellets of sympatric owls like the Great Horned Owl Bubo virginianus magellanicus (Montalvo et al ., 2016), S. chacoensis (López et al ., 2018) and A. cunicularia (Montalvo et al ., 2020) show a higher degree and proportion of digested elements, a higher proportion of breakage on cranial and postcranial elements, lower relative abundance of skeletal elements indicating greater bone loss, and lower preservation of articulated elements, amongst other taphonomic results, than barn owl pellet‐derived small mammal accumulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it also brought the latter closer to samples of burrowing owl ( A. cunicularia ) and Chaco owl ( S. Chacoensis ), whereas the samples reported by Fernández et al . (2012) from the Cueva Huenul archaeological site were grouped mainly with A. cunicularia , a predator for which systematic taphonomic information is also quite recent (Montalvo et al ., 2020). PCA variations are illustrative of how, as actualistic taphonomic studies increase, the possible inferences on accumulating agents of small mammal bone accumulations from archaeological sites are reinforced, corrected and/or systematised.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finalmente, se analizaron restos producidos por la lechucita vizcachera (Athene cunicularia), una rapaz de tamaño pequeño (190-250 mm) con una amplia distribución en todo el Cono Sur sudamericano, que nidifica en cuevas y madrigueras abandonadas por otros animales de hábitos fosoriales y semi-fosoriales (König & Weick, 2010). A. cunicularia posee hábitos preferentemente diurnos y su alimentación depende de las fluctuaciones estacionales en la disponibilidad de presas, por lo que se la considera como una rapaz oportunista (Montalvo et al, 2020).…”
Section: Agentes Productoresunclassified