2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some people feel the rain, others just get wet: An analysis of regional differences in the effects of weather on cycling

Abstract: Between cities and regions, not only cycling levels differ, but also the reactions of cyclists to adverse weather conditions. Using data from 122 automated bicycle counting stations in 30 German cities, and a composite index of adverse weather conditions that consists of air temperature, precipitation, wind speed, relative humidity, and cloud coverage, we calculate city-specific weather elasticities of the level of utilitarian cycling. The results show that these weather elasticities vary significantly between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(53 reference statements)
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thresholds were calculated to be at 28°C, 28°C, 30°C, and 27°C in Montreal, NYC, Seattle, and Austin, respectively ( 25 28 ). This indicates that the magnitude of the weather effects on cyclist demand will vary from city to city, as also noted by Goldmann and Wessel ( 29 ). The magnitude of the effect also varies depending on the use of the bike route.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The thresholds were calculated to be at 28°C, 28°C, 30°C, and 27°C in Montreal, NYC, Seattle, and Austin, respectively ( 25 28 ). This indicates that the magnitude of the weather effects on cyclist demand will vary from city to city, as also noted by Goldmann and Wessel ( 29 ). The magnitude of the effect also varies depending on the use of the bike route.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…They then added each site’s classification as an independent categorical variable in a regression model of bike counts; this was not found to be significant. When determining the influence of weather variables, studies have used regression models such as linear and loglinear ( 24 , 29 ), square root ( 32 ), loglinear in absolute and relative models ( 25 ), and negative binomial with log identity ( 23 , 33 ). Although those models dealt with the nonlinear relationship of temperature by using squared terms, and of precipitation by categorizing that variable, other studies have opted to use general additive models ( 26 , 28 , 33 ) that, instead of assigning a constant coefficient, determined the influence of each variable by function.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I am not the first to hypothesise that the responsiveness of mobility behaviour to climate and weather may differ across space. Most notable are two recent studies by Böcker et al (2019) and Goldmann and Wessel (2021). Böcker et al (2019) find heterogeneous responses to weather and daylight on mobility behaviours in four urban areas in the Netherlands (Utrecht), Norway (Oslo and Stavanger) and Sweden (Stockholm).…”
Section: Previous Research On the Heterogeneity In The Impact Of Clim...mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Paternoster et al, 1998). Goldmann and Wessel (2021) analyse data from bicycle counting stations in German cities and study the effect of an index for adverse weather conditions on cycling counts. Findings reveal substantial geographic variation: that the elasticity of adverse weather differs between cities.…”
Section: Previous Research On the Heterogeneity In The Impact Of Clim...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…weather station data, journey counts) to model the relationship between journeys and weather parameters (e.g. An et al., 2019; Goldmann & Wessel, 2020; Thomas et al., 2013). Others bring together mixed methods (surveys, diaries, interviews, questionnaires) and weather data (e.g.…”
Section: Active Travel: Everyday Decisions and Addressing Routinementioning
confidence: 99%