2015
DOI: 10.1016/s2095-3119(15)61068-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil carbon storage and stratification under different tillage/residue-management practices in double rice cropping system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also found an increasing trend in stratification ratios with BT and ST, which means that SOC accumulated on the surface, but in ST, the opposite trend was observed. The same result has also been found in other reports (Chen et al, ; Lopez‐Fando & Pardo, ; Marinho et al, ). According to Chabbi and Rumpel (), SOC accumulations on the surface are common because of the lower transport rate but surface SOC is prone to mineralization (Murphy et al, ), and the immobilization of organic carbon in deep soil is conducive to the stable accumulation of soil carbon.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also found an increasing trend in stratification ratios with BT and ST, which means that SOC accumulated on the surface, but in ST, the opposite trend was observed. The same result has also been found in other reports (Chen et al, ; Lopez‐Fando & Pardo, ; Marinho et al, ). According to Chabbi and Rumpel (), SOC accumulations on the surface are common because of the lower transport rate but surface SOC is prone to mineralization (Murphy et al, ), and the immobilization of organic carbon in deep soil is conducive to the stable accumulation of soil carbon.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Some research have indicated that with long‐term traditional tillage with removed crop residue, SOC storage can be decreased by 20–50% (Calegari et al, ; Van Eerd, Congreves, Hayes, Verhallen, & Hooker, ). On the contrary, conservation tillage reduces negative effects such as soil erosion, carbon mineralization, and soil degradation caused by traditional tillage and has the potential to convert atmospheric carbon to sink sequestrate (Chen et al, ; Melero, Lopez‐Garrido, Manuel Murillo, & Moreno, ). Furthermore, conservation tillage has the potential to mitigate greenhouse gases within the agricultural sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The N 2 O emission in our study was negligible (0.035-0.078 g m −2 ) during early rice and late rice growth stages in 2019 and 2020. This agrees with previous findings indicating that N 2 O emission from paddy fields was also lower [7,18]. N 2 O emission from paddy fields was the result of soil anaerobic denitrification and aerobic nitrification activities [26].…”
Section: Effects Of Tillage Management On Ch 4 and N 2 O Emissionssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Smith et al [5] found that SOC stock with notillage (NT) treatment was higher than that of the other tillage treatments. Some results indicated that SOC content at the 0-30 cm soil layer with conventional tillage (CT) and NT treatments increased, while C storage (0-5 cm) at the surface layer with NT treatment increased [6][7][8]. However, Chen et al [9] indicated that SOC stock at the 0-20 cm soil layer was not significantly impacted by tillage and crop residue management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, some results indicated that soil C status were improved under ploughing tillage combined with straw return to rice ( Oryza sativa L.) fields compared with RT, but soil easily oxidizable C (EOC) content showed opposite results (Zhu et al, 2014). But some results showed that SOC stock at plough layer in rice fields under RT treatment was higher than that of fields under CT and NT treatments ‐ based on long‐term field experiments (Chen et al, 2015; Mondal et al, 2020). Qi et al (2019) results showed that SOC stock at 0–5 cm depth in rice fields under NT combined with residue retention treatment increased by 12.1%–35.3% ‐ based on a 13‐year field experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%