Core Ideas
SOC and AOC were higher in CT and RT treatments than RTO at 0 to 5, 5 to 10, and 10 to 20 cm.
Lability, LI, and CMI in the CT treatment were higher than NT treatment at 0 to 5 and 10 to 20 cm.
SOC stocks were significantly higher in NT at 0 to 5 cm than under the RTO treatment.
SOC stocks were significantly higher in CT and RT at 5 to 10 and 10 to 20 cm than under RTO.
Interactions between tillage and soil organic carbon (SOC) impact soil structure, soil quality, and the calculated soil carbon management index (CMI). However, the effects of different tillage and residue management systems on the dynamics of SOC remain unclear under double‐cropping rice (Oryza sativa L.). Therefore, the effects of soil tillage and incorporated residues on soil bulk density, SOC, soil active organic carbon (AOC), and the CMI were studied in a southern China double‐cropped rice system. The experiment included four tillage treatments: conventional tillage with residue incorporation (CT), rotary tillage with residue incorporation (RT), no tillage with residue retention (NT), and rotary tillage with residue removed as a control (RTO). The results indicated that soil bulk density increased under NT in the 0‐ to 20‐cm layer, SOC was higher under NT than that of other treatments, and SOC in the 5‐ to 20‐cm layer was higher under CT and RT than under NT and RTO. The greatest SOC and AOC contents were observed under CT at the 5‐ to 10‐cm and 10‐ to 20‐cm layers. The CMI was used to assess the soil quality change with different soil tillage practices. The application of residue combined with conventional tillage or rotary tillage was more effective for increasing soil carbon pool index (CPI) and CMI than was rotary tillage with the residue was removed. The CMI for the 0‐ to 10‐cm depth under RT and CT were higher (P < 0.05) than the NT treatment. Meanwhile, RT significantly enhanced the SOC stocks over the RTO treatment at three different depths. As a result, based on soil CMI and C storage, double‐cropping rice using a no‐tillage system where crop residues are not removed could increase SOC in the surface 5 cm.
Understanding greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions is becoming increasingly important with the climate change. Most previous studies have focused on the assessment of soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration potential and GHG emissions from agriculture. However, specific experiments assessing tillage impacts on GHG emission from double-cropped paddy fields in Southern China are relatively scarce. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the effects of tillage systems on methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emission in a double rice (Oryza sativa L.) cropping system. The experiment was established in 2005 in Hunan Province, China. Three tillage treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design: conventional tillage (CT), rotary tillage (RT) and no-till (NT). Fluxes of CH4 from different tillage treatments followed a similar trend during the two years, with a single peak emission for the early rice season and a double peak emission for the late rice season. Compared with other treatments, NT significantly reduced CH4 emission among the rice growing seasons (P<0.05). However, much higher variations in N2O emission were observed across the rice growing seasons due to the vulnerability of N2O to external influences. The amount of CH4 emission in paddy fields was much higher relative to N2O emission. Conversion of CT to NT significantly reduced the cumulative CH4 emission for both rice seasons compared with other treatments (P<0.05). The mean value of global warming potentials (GWPs) of CH4 and N2O emissions over 100 years was in the order of NT
Effects of long-term fertilization management practices on soil microbial carbon and microbial biomass in paddy soil at various stages of rice growth. Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 2018;42:e0170111.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.