2014
DOI: 10.5747/cv.2014.v06.n1.v089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Softwares Mais Utilizados Na Fotogrametria Para Avaliação Da Postura Corporal Nos Estudos E Nos Periódicos Brasileiros

Abstract: The postural assessment method most frequently used among Brazilian studies hasbeen photogrammetry. Objective: To verify that the software most used in photogrammetry currently in experimental studies published in Brazilian journals. A systematic review, following the PRISMA recommendations. The key terms were chosen through Descriptors Health (DeCS) and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), finding in Portuguese: Photogrammetry; software; posture; Spinal Diseases; … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reliability studies report that ICC above 0.7 is used as threshold of "sufficiently reproducible." ICC values below 0.70 are considered unacceptable; between 0.71 and 0.79, acceptable; between 0.80 and 0.89, very good; and above 0.90, excellent [20][21][22] . Additionally, the Bland Altman analysis was carried out to evaluate the correlation between the two evaluations (EV1 and EV2) of each evaluator, for every angle in every position, standing and sitting, in order to show the bias, the error, and the presence of outliers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliability studies report that ICC above 0.7 is used as threshold of "sufficiently reproducible." ICC values below 0.70 are considered unacceptable; between 0.71 and 0.79, acceptable; between 0.80 and 0.89, very good; and above 0.90, excellent [20][21][22] . Additionally, the Bland Altman analysis was carried out to evaluate the correlation between the two evaluations (EV1 and EV2) of each evaluator, for every angle in every position, standing and sitting, in order to show the bias, the error, and the presence of outliers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%