2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft tissue elastometer

Abstract: We have developed a device entitled the 'Tissue Elastometer' (TE) for evaluating the Young's modulus of soft tissues. Soft tissue specimens are compressed between the object plate of an electronic balance and a linearly actuated indenter with a small rounded tip. The hardware of the device was designed such that a deformation model for semi-infinite media is applicable for calculating the Young's modulus of test specimens from their collected force-displacement data.Force-elongation measurements were performed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
75
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(10 reference statements)
4
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies [Egorov et al 2008;Li et al 2006;Yu et al 2006;Sinkus et al 2000] on the elastic properties of soft tissue reveal that soft tissue shows complex visco-elastic and non-linear characteristics. The elasticity values measured in the different studies are: between 5 and 35 kPa in [Egorov et al 2008], 6 and 11 kPa in ], 0 and 3.5 kPa in [Sinkus et al 2000] and 9.3 kPa in [Yu et al 2006]. The difference in the mentioned studies is related to tissue type, the magnitude of deformation, the non-linear behaviour of the elasticity and the level of precompression as discussed in [Samani et al 2003].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies [Egorov et al 2008;Li et al 2006;Yu et al 2006;Sinkus et al 2000] on the elastic properties of soft tissue reveal that soft tissue shows complex visco-elastic and non-linear characteristics. The elasticity values measured in the different studies are: between 5 and 35 kPa in [Egorov et al 2008], 6 and 11 kPa in ], 0 and 3.5 kPa in [Sinkus et al 2000] and 9.3 kPa in [Yu et al 2006]. The difference in the mentioned studies is related to tissue type, the magnitude of deformation, the non-linear behaviour of the elasticity and the level of precompression as discussed in [Samani et al 2003].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stiffness matrix K is built using the material parameters, Young's modulus and Poisson ratio, adopted from the literature [11]. The elements' topology is obtained from kidney and tumour 3D segmentations meshed using Gmsh 1 .…”
Section: B Biomechanical Modeling Of Tissue Deformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another solution consists to use inverse analysis (Miller 2000, Tillier et al 2003, Durand-Reville et al 2004, Egorov et al 2008) at the structure level. A numerical model of the liver governed by a finite number of parameters must then be built.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%