2012
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2011.569884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse analysis and robustness evaluation for biological structure behaviour in FE simulation: application to the liver

Abstract: To prevent abdominal organs traumas, the definition of efficient safety devices should be based on a detailed knowledge of injury mechanisms and related injury criteria. In this sense, FE simulation coupled to experiment could be a valuable tool to provide a better understanding of internal organs behaviour under crash conditions. This work proposes a methodology based on inverse analysis which combines exploration process optimisation and robustness study to obtain mechanical behaviour of the complex structur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method is employed to integrate viscoelastic or hyperelastic constitutive laws over the geometric domain of an organ [4]. Intensive work has been done on measurement and estimation of soft tissue constitutive laws [6,3], nevertheless, it is still unclear where the effort should be put to obtain accurate and realistic results [5]. We propose to investigate the role of the surrounding tissues and the boundary conditions that are often under-estimated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is employed to integrate viscoelastic or hyperelastic constitutive laws over the geometric domain of an organ [4]. Intensive work has been done on measurement and estimation of soft tissue constitutive laws [6,3], nevertheless, it is still unclear where the effort should be put to obtain accurate and realistic results [5]. We propose to investigate the role of the surrounding tissues and the boundary conditions that are often under-estimated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%