Six Sigma Project Critical Success Factor Prioritization Using MADM Technique

Zandhessami, Hessam; Rahgozar, Arezoo

doi:10.33422/ijarme.2018.08.11

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Sreedharan et al (2018b) used the expert-rating approach and TOPSIS method to summarise vital CSF. Zandhessami and Rahgozar (2018) used the DEMATEL approach. Raval et al (2019) suggested the integration of LSS with Balanced-Scorecard for further effectiveness of LSS.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Considering these disparities, the nomenclature of some factors included in Table 2 is changed to bring clarity. For example, the ambiguous term “quality maturity level of organisation” used by Soti et al (2010); and by Zandhessami and Rahgozar (2018), is re-phrased as “Prior quality systems in organisation e.g. ISO 9001” which is very specific and clears confusion.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Critical success factors for lean six sigma in quality 4.0

Yadav

Shankar

Singh

2021

IJQSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Critical success factors (CSF) for lean six sigma (LSS) using quality 4.0 are not researched so far. This study aims to bridge this gap. It also validates CSF already identified for LSS under conventional technologies. Design methodology approach Empirical research using the questionnaire method is conducted. Construct of the questionnaire is checked using Cronbach’s alpha and responses received are analysed using t-test and exploratory factor analysis. Findings In total, 20 factors are evaluated for LSS success. It includes 7 factors related to quality 4.0 technologies and 13 related to the conventional set-up. All 7 quality 4.0 related factors were found critical; whereas, under traditional set-up, 11 factors out of 13 were found critical. Practical implications The study will help enterprises in the fast and effective adoption of quality 4.0 and seamless integration with LSS. The post-Covid-19 business scenario is expected to be information technology focussed. The findings of this study will be useful in these circumstances. Consultants and practitioners can prioritise their efforts based on newly identified CSF. The new revelation about CSF for LSS in quality 4.0 enriches theory as well. Social implications Developing skills based on newly identified CSF will help people in remaining employable in the era of automation, robotics and artificial intelligence which is otherwise ill-famed for destroying jobs. Originality value CSF for LSS using quality 4.0 is a new contribution. It differentiates CSF established earlier for conventional technologies. Moreover, many CSF are common for LSS and industry 4.0, therefore this study will also help in smoother adoption of industry 4.0/quality 4.0 in organisations.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical success factors for lean six sigma in quality 4.0

Yadav

Shankar

Singh

2021

IJQSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Also, the lack of information technology (IT) failure factor is addressed in this study under Quality 4.0 framework. Zandhessami and Rahgozar (2018) used Dematel method for identifying hierarchy of critical factors. They also found top leadership, and committed workforce as main drivers of LSS.…”

Section: Comparison Of Hierarchical Models With Prior Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Laosirihongthong et al (2006) also adopted AHP approach. Zandhessami and Rahgozar (2018) used Dematel (Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) approach for this purpose. Sreedharan et al (2018) used TOPSIS (The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) methodology to establish hierarchy of critical failure (not success) factors for LSS.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hierarchy of Critical Success Factors (CSF) for Lean Six Sigma (LSS) in Quality 4.0

Yadav

Shankar

Singh

2021

JGBC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The fourth industrial revolution, often termed as Industry 4.0 or Smart Manufacturing, is influencing all aspects of business management. Application of Industry 4.0 for quality management purpose is termed Quality 4.0. Lean Six Sigma (LSS) implementation process is also getting influenced by Quality 4.0. Use of Lean Six Sigma in Industry 4.0/Quality 4.0 can create differentiation in performance, and will improve competitiveness of organizations, besides making them future ready. Critical Success Factors (CSF) for Lean Six Sigma in Quality 4.0 set-up are recently established. However, the hierarchy of Critical Success Factors (CSF) for Lean Six Sigma under Quality 4.0 framework is not yet available. This paper establishes the hierarchy using multiple methodologies including ISM (Interpretive Structural Modelling) and TISM (Total Interpretive Structural Modelling), MICMAC (cross-impact matrix multiplication applied to classification), and Hierarchical Clustering. Managerial and theoretical implications of this study are presented from both Lean Six Sigma, and Information Technology perspectives.

show abstract

“…In situations of economic and ecological turbulence, eco innovation theory can be used to design strategies that are more effective and proactive for business model strategies in order to meet the triple bottom line of economic, social, and ecological sustainability [58]. Green product innovation and green product process innovation will affect two green innovation value chain constructions: competitive advantage and the success of new green products [59]. Analysis of the impact of competitive advantage on green products is also needed as a partial mediator in the relationship between green process innovation and the success of new green products [60].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biomass Energy Business Model on Sustainable Bamboo Forest

Wahono¹,

Sumarwan²,

Arifin³

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: This study objective to create a business model for the development of renewable energy based on bamboo forest biomass for underdeveloped and remote islands in Indonesia. Electrical energy has a vital and strategic role, to support national development and must be realized reliably, safely, equitably and environmentally friendly. Many problems occur in the management of the national electricity system, including dependence on the supply of fossil-fuel primary energy sources, as well as Indonesia's geographical condition which consists of many islands making it difficult to process the transmission and distribution of electrical energy. Electricity generation from renewable energy sources based on bamboo forest biomass can be a solution to the above problems. The research questions to (1) analyze what factors will influence uncertainty in the development of renewable energy based on bamboo forest biomass; (2) analyze the indicators of the success of the development of renewable energy based on sustainable bamboo forest biomass. (3) designing a business model for the development of renewable energy based on bamboo forest biomass in rural areas that can guarantee sustainable regional growth. Methods: The study uses soft systems methodology techniques in the form of case studies supported by field surveys and literature studies. Qualitative analysis was carried out with a Focus Group Discussion and in-depth interviews with experts aimed at identifying indicators of success in developing sustainable renewable energy. The analysis technique uses two analytical methods, Strategic Assumption Surfacing and Testing (SAST) and Interpretative Structural Modeling (ISM). The location of the study was conducted in three villages in Siberut Island, Mentawai Islands Regency, West Sumatra Conclusions: There were numbers of key elements in designing a business model for the development of renewable energy based on bamboo forest biomass, namely electricity subsidy rates, community forest land status, donor agencies, village community participation, income distribution and cooperative partnership of bamboo farmers. Business model that was designed in this study requires five things, specifically; (1) Clustering, (2) High tariffs, (3) Non-commercial funding, (4) Community Forestry, and (5) Community Empowerment.

show abstract

Six Sigma Project Critical Success Factor Prioritization Using MADM Technique

Cited by 3 publications

References 11 publications

Critical success factors for lean six sigma in quality 4.0

Critical success factors for lean six sigma in quality 4.0

Hierarchy of Critical Success Factors (CSF) for Lean Six Sigma (LSS) in Quality 4.0

Biomass Energy Business Model on Sustainable Bamboo Forest

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About