2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2207552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site-specific dopant profiling in a scanning electron microscope using focused ion beam prepared specimens

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inSecondary electron doping contrast: Theory based on scanning electron microscope and Kelvin probe force microscopy measurementsExtending the detection limit of dopants for focused ion beam prepared semiconductor specimens examined by off-axis electron holography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further studies are required in order to minimize artifacts due to FIB induced contrast degradation resulting from near-surface damage. 28 The agreement between the experimental contrast profile and the energy of the valence bandedge calculated using adjusted ionized dopant densities in Fig. 7 suggests that SEM dopant contrast imaging is a suitable candidate for 2D charge mapping in compound semiconductors, although further studies are necessary in order to quantitatively correlate experimental contrast and charge density.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Further studies are required in order to minimize artifacts due to FIB induced contrast degradation resulting from near-surface damage. 28 The agreement between the experimental contrast profile and the energy of the valence bandedge calculated using adjusted ionized dopant densities in Fig. 7 suggests that SEM dopant contrast imaging is a suitable candidate for 2D charge mapping in compound semiconductors, although further studies are necessary in order to quantitatively correlate experimental contrast and charge density.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…FIB milling seems to be an ideal solution, since it is routinely used in device failure analysis and sample preparation for TEM. The drawback of FIB is the formation of an amorphous layer, which contributes to a DC decrease (Kazemian et al, 2006b;Cooper et al, 2009Cooper et al, , 2010Cooper et al, , 2011Chee et al, 2010). It is known that the thickness of this amorphous layer decreases with decreasing ion energy, therefore TEM lamella preparation and FIB nanostructuring is usually done by low-energy ion milling and polishing (Kato et al, 1999;Giannuzzi et al, 2005;Mayer et al, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our procedure uses final preparation polishing steps providing minimization of a damaged layer thickness (Giannuzzi et al, 2005), similar to the commonly used technique for preparation of lamellas needed in high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) experiments. After the initial cross-section milling using 30 keV Ga + FIB (Kazemian et al, 2006 b ), we polished the cross-section surface using an ion beam with energies down to 1 keV. The obtained contrast values from variously doped areas were quantitatively comparable to those achieved by sample cleavage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…By investigating biased junctions, Elliott et al [4] attributed the contrast mechanism to the varying collection efficiency of the SE detector caused by the p-n junction potential. SEM-based contrast mapping of dopants continues to be actively pursued in the current literature [5][6][7], using both SE and backscattered electron emission [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%