2019
DOI: 10.1364/oe.27.021130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SiN/Si double-layer platform for ultralow-crosstalk multiport optical switches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we consider that the PILOSS topology has potential advantages for larger port count switches. In future, however, if multilayer platform technologies [17], [18] that can eliminate the insertion loss of the intersection get matured, the switch-and-select topology may be an option. The double-layer network [19] that is a different version of switch-and-select topology will be also another option in terms of loss, although the power consumption of the switch-and-select topology will be an issue for a large-port-count switch since the number of bar-state switches (ON switches) is much larger than that of the other topologies.…”
Section: Table I Optical Switch Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we consider that the PILOSS topology has potential advantages for larger port count switches. In future, however, if multilayer platform technologies [17], [18] that can eliminate the insertion loss of the intersection get matured, the switch-and-select topology may be an option. The double-layer network [19] that is a different version of switch-and-select topology will be also another option in terms of loss, although the power consumption of the switch-and-select topology will be an issue for a large-port-count switch since the number of bar-state switches (ON switches) is much larger than that of the other topologies.…”
Section: Table I Optical Switch Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It changes direction from the horizontal of a plane to the vertical part. The former could use an overlay junction [6], while the latter could be found [29]. Thus, the four-port modules will not cause technical problems when adding layers.…”
Section: Switch Topologies Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the practical challenge of optical switches is to eliminate the insertion loss and crosstalk [3]. Currently, the most advanced large-scale architectures include Switchand-Select [6], Benes [7], [8], Clos-Benes [9], PILOSS [10], Spanke-Benes [11], and Fat-tree [12], [13]. Among these methods, the Benes method is a promising technology as it eliminates insertion loss with the least number of optical switches [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PTICAL switches are of importance in next-generation telecom and datacom applications with reduced energy consumptions [1][2][3]. Waveguide-based planar optical switches have recently attracted considerable attention because they are advantageous in terms of cost and reliability [4][5][6][7]. Most waveguide-based optical switches utilize only one layer of waveguides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most waveguide-based optical switches utilize only one layer of waveguides. A multi-layer optical circuit is beneficial to reduce the crosstalk, although it increases the design complexity; i.e., a small interlayer gap causes a large loss at the intersection, while a large interlayer gap causes a large loss at the transition structure [7,8]. We consider that for small-and mid-scale switches, single-layer optical circuits are advantageous because of their simple designs, simple fabrication processes, and lowloss characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%