2009
DOI: 10.26719/2009.15.1.178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significant caries index values and related factors in 5-6-year-old children in Istanbul, Turkey

Abstract: To evaluate significant caries (SiC) index values and related factors in Turkish children aged 5-6 years old, children from 5 nursery schools in Istanbul were included in a cross-sectional study. Sociodemographic information and data about oral care habits were obtained from the records and from parents. Of 542 students examined, the mean decayed/missing/filled primary teeth (dmft) index was 3.74 (SD 3.49) and the SiC index was 7.75 (SD 2.56). About 76.8% of the children had experienced dental caries. Logistic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
28
1
16

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
7
28
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…In our sample the SiC index value (5.57) was almost equivalent to that revealed by Städtler in 516 Austrian children 6-year-olds [17] (6.1); while it was higher (8.1) in a study carried out by Adewakun in Eastern Trinidad for 6-year-olds children [18]. The figure is also worse, as reported by Namal et al [18], in 542 Turkish children, five-six years old (7.75); however, it was better in Australia for 6 years old children with SiC index about 4.7 [19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our sample the SiC index value (5.57) was almost equivalent to that revealed by Städtler in 516 Austrian children 6-year-olds [17] (6.1); while it was higher (8.1) in a study carried out by Adewakun in Eastern Trinidad for 6-year-olds children [18]. The figure is also worse, as reported by Namal et al [18], in 542 Turkish children, five-six years old (7.75); however, it was better in Australia for 6 years old children with SiC index about 4.7 [19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Many studies pointed out that besides the comparison with literature data, SiC index is a reliable tool used to assess the caries risk and to identify the group of at risk children who showed caries level significantly higher than a general population [16][17][18]. In our sample the SiC index value (5.57) was almost equivalent to that revealed by Städtler in 516 Austrian children 6-year-olds [17] (6.1); while it was higher (8.1) in a study carried out by Adewakun in Eastern Trinidad for 6-year-olds children [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ortodontik tedavi görmeyen bireylerde SiC baz alınarak yapılan iki çalışma 5,6 ; ortodontik tedavi gören bireylerde iki farklı risk grubuna göre DMFT durumunu takip eden bir çalışma 10 ve ortodontik tedavi gören bireylerde tedavi öncesi ve bitiminde BNL oluşum sıklığını rapor eden bir çalışma 9 bulunmaktadır.…”
Section: Materyal Ve Metodunclassified
“…Ülkemizde SiC ile ilgili yapılan sınırlı sayıda çalışma bulunmaktadır. 5,6 İstanbul' da, 2183 birey üzerinde yapılan bir çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre 18-19 yaş grubundaki bireylerde DMFT değeri 4.96 iken, SiC değerinin 6 olduğu bildirilmiştir. 5 Meksika' da genç yetişkinler üzerinde yapılan bir çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre 18 yaşındaki bireyler DMFT indeksi 4.04 bulunurken, SiC değerinin 8,64 olduğu rapor edilmiştir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…According to WHO, 60-90% of students around the world have tooth decay, with highest prevalence reported in Asian and Latin American countries 13 . The prevalence ranged from 50% in 5-9 years American children , 59-92% in 2-6 years old children in Philippine, 55% in 3-5 years old children in China, more than 89% in 6 years old Taiwanese children 14 , 93% in 6 years old Russian 15 , and 76.8% in 5-6 years old children in Turkey 16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%