2015 Symposium on VLSI Technology (VLSI Technology) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/vlsit.2015.7223654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Si-cap-free SiGe p-channel FinFETs and gate-all-around transistors in a replacement metal gate process: Interface trap density reduction and performance improvement by high-pressure deuterium anneal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Where ψms is the work function difference between metal and semiconductor, ψm' and χ' are the modified metal work function and electron affinity which are modified to the oxide conduction band, and the potential ψ fp is the difference between EFi and EF. Since the identical TiN gate metal and the high-k oxide layer HZO are used for the two different devices, the energy band gap difference between Si and Si0.8Ge0.2 is about 0.14eV, and the electron affinity difference is negligible, from the equation (1) and (2), it is only 0.07V VFB difference which attribute to different materials used for two devices. As a result, the 0.3V VTH shift for the Si0.8Ge0.2 UT-FinFET is mostly due to the Quantum confinement effect (QCE) which is invoked as the fin channel has only 5 nm width.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where ψms is the work function difference between metal and semiconductor, ψm' and χ' are the modified metal work function and electron affinity which are modified to the oxide conduction band, and the potential ψ fp is the difference between EFi and EF. Since the identical TiN gate metal and the high-k oxide layer HZO are used for the two different devices, the energy band gap difference between Si and Si0.8Ge0.2 is about 0.14eV, and the electron affinity difference is negligible, from the equation (1) and (2), it is only 0.07V VFB difference which attribute to different materials used for two devices. As a result, the 0.3V VTH shift for the Si0.8Ge0.2 UT-FinFET is mostly due to the Quantum confinement effect (QCE) which is invoked as the fin channel has only 5 nm width.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed earlier, achieving ideal sub-threshold characteristics is challenging for HGC SiGe devices using a Si-cap-free surface passivation process, especially in an RMG flow. Best values reported so far for HGC SiGe and Ge FinFETs are in the range of 80-100mV/dec [8][9][10][11]. Figure 11 shows median long-channel sub-threshold slope (SS) (Ldes=1µm) of our HGC SiGe FinFETs with an optimized gate first process, a standard RMG baseline and an optimized RMG process.…”
Section: Electrical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it prevents the boron from diffusing into high-k because the diffusion into hafnium oxide (HfO 2 ) occurs much slower than SiO 2 [ 232 , 233 ]. The RMG process still will work well for the 7 nm and 5 nm technology node with SiGe nanowires through selectively removing the Si sacrificial layer from the SiGe channel material [ 234 ]. Meanwhile, for technology nodes 3 nm and beyond, the sacrificial material is SiGe and will be selectively removed from Ge channel [ 235 , 236 , 237 ].…”
Section: Wet Cleaningmentioning
confidence: 99%