1979
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1110(79)90014-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term tests for carcinogens and mutagens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0
4

Year Published

1981
1981
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 484 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 413 publications
0
73
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Since such biological reactions indicate DNA damage, they can be useful in detecting carcinogenic and mutagenic effects (Hollstein et al, 1979;Zeiger, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since such biological reactions indicate DNA damage, they can be useful in detecting carcinogenic and mutagenic effects (Hollstein et al, 1979;Zeiger, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cu ions injected into the ascites, tumour were found to be present in the DNA double helix structure (Agarwal et al 1990). Cu compounds have been also found to be genotoxic in animal cells in culture (Flessel 1978, Hollstein et al 1979. However, similar results were not observed in bacterial colorimetric assay the SOS chromotest (Olivier and Marzin 1987).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…This list is not exhaustive and the degree to which these tests have been validated varies widely. comparability with carcinogenicity data obtained in vivo (59,60 The test systems considered either incorporate some aspects of mammalian metabolism, e.g., by adding a microsomal fraction of rodent or human liver in vitro or by using metabolically competent rodent cells, or involve activation in vivo, as in the host-mediated assay in intact mammalian organisms and in the test in Drosophila melanogaster (Table 3). Because of its efficiency, low cost and rapidity, the Salmonella/microsome test has been used most extensively; it therefore also has been most extensively validated, and 30 identified and suspected human carcinogens have been assayed (Tables 4 and 5 Of the possible human carcinogens (Table 5), amitrole, carbon tetrachloride and polychlorinated Table 3; classification refers to test systems grouped in Table 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%