2012
DOI: 10.4238/2012.march.22.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short Communication Genetic variation in a wild population of the ‘sleep’ passion fruit (Passiflora setacea) based on molecular markers

Abstract: ABSTRACT.Little is known about the molecular genetic diversity of most Passiflora species. We used RAPD markers to evaluate the genetic diversity of 24 genotypes of the 'sleep' passion fruit (Passiflora setacea). Twelve primers generated 95 markers, 88% of which were polymorphic. The genetic distance estimated by the complement of the Dice index ranged from 0.29 (among accessions Ps-G1 and Ps-G13) to 0.69 (among accessions Ps-G21 and Ps- G23). Genotype grouping based on the UPGMA algorithm showed considerable… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, an intraspecific analysis with ISSR markers found higher polymorphism (98%) in P. alata . In interspecific analyses, a higher rate of polymorphism in combination with an increased average number of amplified bands per primer is indicative of high genetic variability (Cerqueira-Silva et al, 2012). Nevertheless, high intraspecific genetic variability was also observed here among the eight P. cincinnata accessions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, an intraspecific analysis with ISSR markers found higher polymorphism (98%) in P. alata . In interspecific analyses, a higher rate of polymorphism in combination with an increased average number of amplified bands per primer is indicative of high genetic variability (Cerqueira-Silva et al, 2012). Nevertheless, high intraspecific genetic variability was also observed here among the eight P. cincinnata accessions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In agreement with this expectation, we observed greater interspecific polymorphism (99%) than intraspecific polymorphism (76%) in Passiflora. An intraspecific analysis performed using RAPD markers reported an average of 63.8% polymorphism in P. nitida (Ganga et al, 2004) and in P. setacae (Cerqueira-Silva et al, 2012). However, an intraspecific analysis with ISSR markers found higher polymorphism (98%) in P. alata .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…From the total number of markers, 82% were polymorphic in RAPD, and 91.2% were polymorphic in ISSR, showing the highgenetic variability among the six cultivars. A high polymorphism indicating the high-genetic variability of the Passiflora genus by RAPD markers has already been reported by Bellon et al (2009Bellon et al ( , 2014, Viana et al (2010), Castro et al (2011), andCerqueira-Silva et al (2012). This fact have been verified also by Santos et al (2011b), Costa et al (2012), and Sousa et al (2015) by using ISSR markers.…”
Section: Descriptor Number 22)supporting
confidence: 63%
“…For some species, such as P. caerulea , P. cincinnata , P. coccinea , and P. setacea , interspecific hybrids are being developed and characterized [33,54,72] and estimates of genetic diversity and confirmation of the hybrids based on molecular markers are being carried out [54,62,63]. …”
Section: Contributions Of Molecular and Genetic Studies For The Chmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 90% of the area designated for passion fruit culture is cultivated with P. edulis , and P. alata is the second most cultivated species of the genus [54,61]. Although they represent a small proportion of national production, the cultivation and consumption of fruits from wild species, such as Passiflora cincinnata , Passiflora nitida , P. quadrangularis , and P. setacea , have been reported in the literature [31,57,61,62,63]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%