2012
DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2010.487967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape and Size Variability of Roasted Arabica Coffee Beans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, considering the roast coffee chemical characteristics, this model cannot be applied to roast coffee. [40,41] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, considering the roast coffee chemical characteristics, this model cannot be applied to roast coffee. [40,41] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The similar approach was successfully used for calculation of radius of curvature of coffee beans. [23] The precise calculation of the egg's surface and volume was solved in the following step. The common way of how to obtain these quantities consists of the use of simple formulae given by Eqs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following parameters were analysed using Mohsenin method (Mohsenin, 1986) and approach described in Tabatabaeefar (2002). Geometric mean diameter, GM, was determined from the cubic roots of three diameters, 3 LDW and percentage sphericity was equal to the geometric mean diameter divided by the longest diameter and multiplied by 100.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its practical impact, the methods describing the potato tuber shape based on various techniques were proposed (Tabatabaeefar, 2002;Torppa et al, 2006;Khojastehnazhand et al, 2010;Omid et al, 2010;Bubeníčková and Simeonovová, 2011;Severa et al, 2011). The spectra of possible application and methodological approaches ranges from microstructure level (Severa et al, 2010) to purely computational methods and processing and reducing of large amount of image analysis data (Bartoň et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%