2019
DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2019.1683588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-efficacy and problem-solving skills in mathematics: the effect of instruction-based dynamic versus static visualization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As already stated by Okumuş et al (2016), so that students can benefit from the use of CS in their exploration activities, it is necessary that they have prior knowledge of the contents involved in the tasks; (2) within the strategies in which the teacher's intervention is strongest in the beginning, the one that assigns tasks to students with CS exploration (EXPLORA 1) is the most effective. Animations are more effective (Yang et al 2018) and have a greater impact (Kohen et al 2019) than static images, in learning and understanding invisible phenomena and in understanding the dynamic behavior of matter. They facilitate the construction of abstract concepts (Olympiou et al 2013;Araújo et al 2017).…”
Section: Results Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already stated by Okumuş et al (2016), so that students can benefit from the use of CS in their exploration activities, it is necessary that they have prior knowledge of the contents involved in the tasks; (2) within the strategies in which the teacher's intervention is strongest in the beginning, the one that assigns tasks to students with CS exploration (EXPLORA 1) is the most effective. Animations are more effective (Yang et al 2018) and have a greater impact (Kohen et al 2019) than static images, in learning and understanding invisible phenomena and in understanding the dynamic behavior of matter. They facilitate the construction of abstract concepts (Olympiou et al 2013;Araújo et al 2017).…”
Section: Results Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dari kedua faktor itulah jelas bahwa hasil kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa masih belum menunjukkan hasil yang optimal dengan diperolehnya rata-rata hasil kemampuan penalaran matematis sebesar 55,48. Kontribusi self-efficacy yang dimiliki oleh siswa dapat mendukung peningkatan kemampuan penalaran matematis dapat ditemukan pada penelitian-penelitian sebelumnya (Czocher et al, 2020;Kohen et al, 2019;Van der Bijl, J. J., & Shortridge-Baggett, 2002) . Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, didapat bahwa kontribusi self-efficacy dan mathematics anxiety hanya 0,386 artinya 38,6% kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa mampu dapat diprediksi berdasarkan self-efficacy dan mathematics anxiety, sedangkan sisanya yaitu 61,4 % dapat diprediksi dari faktor yang lain diantaranya motivasi, gender, kesiapan belajar dan kemandirian belajar.…”
Section: Anova Aunclassified
“…Problem-solving skills are also used to overcome student addiction to the internet (Ekinci, 2014). Problem-solving in mathematics is also helpful in (Kohen et al, 2019;Öztürk et al, 2020), science (Akben, 2020), entrepreneurs, and engineering scholars (Dickson, 2006), and sports (Senduran & Amman, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%