2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-566x2010000200018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seleção de genótipos resistentes de amendoinzeiro a Anticarsia gemmatalis Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) com base em análises multivariadas

Abstract: -The velvetbean caterpillar Anticarsia gemmatalis Hübner attacks peanut leaves, and the use of resistant varieties has directly contributed to ecological and economic aspects of pest control. The aim of this work was to select resistant peanut genotypes to A. gemmatalis using cluster analyses (dendogram obtained by Ward's methods and K-means) and Principal Components analysis for data interpretation. The evaluated genotypes were: IAC 5, IAC 8112, IAC 22 and IAC Tatu ST with upright growth habit, and IAC 147, I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of the linear relationship between the traits and the distribution of genotypes according to the projection of the vectors of the traits in the same analysis can be considered comprehensive and thorough analysis. Dallastra et al (2014), in a study on the selection of soybean genotypes carriers of the RR gene, and Pitta et al (2010), in a study on the selection of genotypes of groundnut resistant to Anticarsia gemmatalis, noted that principal componente analysis was efficient in the process of selection, leading to genetic gains for agronomic traits of interest, which is an advantageous and appropriate situation to identify superior genotypes. DS = differential of selection; MSG = Average of selected genotypes; MG 0 = overall average of genotypes; PHF = plant height at flowering (cm); PHM = plant height at maturity (cm); HIP = height at insertion of the first pod (cm); GP = grain productivity (PG) in kg ha -1 ; NN = number of nodes; NP = number of pods per plant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The combination of the linear relationship between the traits and the distribution of genotypes according to the projection of the vectors of the traits in the same analysis can be considered comprehensive and thorough analysis. Dallastra et al (2014), in a study on the selection of soybean genotypes carriers of the RR gene, and Pitta et al (2010), in a study on the selection of genotypes of groundnut resistant to Anticarsia gemmatalis, noted that principal componente analysis was efficient in the process of selection, leading to genetic gains for agronomic traits of interest, which is an advantageous and appropriate situation to identify superior genotypes. DS = differential of selection; MSG = Average of selected genotypes; MG 0 = overall average of genotypes; PHF = plant height at flowering (cm); PHM = plant height at maturity (cm); HIP = height at insertion of the first pod (cm); GP = grain productivity (PG) in kg ha -1 ; NN = number of nodes; NP = number of pods per plant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several multivariate methods can be applied to selection of superior genotypes, allowing also to observe the influence of agronomic traits in the selection of genotypes and the relationships between them. We emphasize the use of principal component analysis can be used in experimental data based on the average of genotypes for each trait, as used by Dallastra et al (2014); Viana et al (2013); Pitta et al (2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study with multivariate analysis for resistant peanut genotypes selection, Pitta et al (2010) concluded that Ward and K-means clustering methods were efficient and complementary to the principal components analysis, also presented in this study. Due to the presented variability within the accessions, the generated dendrogram did not reveal a pattern with similar geographic regions, and it is explained by the fact that each group brings together different accessions within it.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…These methods are more suitable for assessing genetic divergence because it allow a more holistic interpretation of data, once consider the potential of the random trait sets, setting them at the same level of importance (Cruz and Regazzi, 2014). Among them, clustering and graphic dispersion techniques have been widely adopted by breeders (Pitta et al, 2010;Cruz and Regazzi, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods of graphic dispersion more often used are Principal Components (PC) and Canonical Variables (CV) analyses, that are linear combinations of the original quantitative measurements that contain the highest possible multiple correlation with each group and that best summarize among-class variation (Pitta et al, 2010;Cruz and Regazzi, 2014). To plant breeder, CV are more contributive because it allows the interpretation of the data with repetition, taking into account the residual covariance between the means of genotypes (Oliveira et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%