2013
DOI: 10.1080/07060661.2013.827134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening of mungbean (Vigna radiata) germplasm for resistance toMungbean yellow mosaic virususing agroinoculation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The low level of disease exhibited by A-555 at field level may be due to the inability of whitefly to introduce a sufficient quantity of virus particles into the plants to cause a severe disease response as reported earlier in case of tomato against tomato leaf curl geminivirus and in case of non-Bt Gossypium specie against CLCuBuV (Akhtar et al, 2010; Tripathi and Varma 2002). Under field conditions, natural infection may not produce accurate results even if the studies are conducted in field with high vector populations (Sudha et al, 2013). An effective screening method is a critical component of an accurate disease assay for quantifying the levels of disease resistance among crop cultivars (Kim et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low level of disease exhibited by A-555 at field level may be due to the inability of whitefly to introduce a sufficient quantity of virus particles into the plants to cause a severe disease response as reported earlier in case of tomato against tomato leaf curl geminivirus and in case of non-Bt Gossypium specie against CLCuBuV (Akhtar et al, 2010; Tripathi and Varma 2002). Under field conditions, natural infection may not produce accurate results even if the studies are conducted in field with high vector populations (Sudha et al, 2013). An effective screening method is a critical component of an accurate disease assay for quantifying the levels of disease resistance among crop cultivars (Kim et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of constraints in natural screening and the chances of mixed infection, implementing an artificial screening technique is strongly needed to mitigate this issue. Several groups, including Jacob et al [147], Gupta et al [118], Sudha et al [15], and Sai et al [51], have used artificial screening techniques combined with agro-inoculation for the strict screening of breeding material against the specific YMD-causing viruses. In our opinion, agro-inoculation coupled with the spreader row and force-feeding techniques will give more precise information about the true resistant genotypes by confirming all the involved parameters, like the susceptible host, natural environment, and the presence of virus and vector.…”
Section: Durable Sources Of Lymv Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…YMD was first reported in lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus) in 1940 [10] and was subsequently discovered in other plants, such as Dolichos bean (Dolichos lablab) [11,12] and mungbean [13]. It creates malformations in mungbean plants, which in turn inhibit photosynthetic efficiency and plant growth, ultimately leading to significant yield losses [7,14,15]. Khattak et al [16] reported that YMD might lead to up to 32%-78% reduction in grain yield of mungbean.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screening the germplasms using different MYMV isolates through agroinoculation technique is the effective method for assessing the genetic diversity for MYMV resistance in mungbean (Karthikeyan et al 2011). Recently, Sudha et al (2013b) screened the mungbean germplasms using two different MYMV isolates. The results show that among the seventy eight mungbean genotypes screened, four genotypes exhibited resistance to the isolates of MYMV.…”
Section: Pathogen-derived Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%