2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.02.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy: 1 and 3 Nonmydriatic 45-degree Digital Fundus Photographs vs 7 Standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
111
1
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
111
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…18 This is in contrast to some previous studies suggesting that a single central 45°fundus image may have good sensitivity and specificity to determine absence or presence of diabetic retinopathy but may not be as good for grading the severity. [21][22][23] By using the presence of macular hard exudates as a surrogate marker for possible diabetic macular edema, it has been estimated that 95% of eyes with suspected diabetic macular edema could be identified with nFP. 24 We initially hypothesized that diabetic retinopathy might be more common among diabetic patients screened in rural medical clinics than in an urban academic center because the rural sites would have limited access to eye care providers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 This is in contrast to some previous studies suggesting that a single central 45°fundus image may have good sensitivity and specificity to determine absence or presence of diabetic retinopathy but may not be as good for grading the severity. [21][22][23] By using the presence of macular hard exudates as a surrogate marker for possible diabetic macular edema, it has been estimated that 95% of eyes with suspected diabetic macular edema could be identified with nFP. 24 We initially hypothesized that diabetic retinopathy might be more common among diabetic patients screened in rural medical clinics than in an urban academic center because the rural sites would have limited access to eye care providers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-mydriatic 45-degree digital fundus photography has compared favorably with ophthalmoscopy [12,13]. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting sight-threatening DR using a single non-mydriatic 45-degree digital fundus photograph has been reported to range from 61 to 77% and 85 to 99%, respectively [11][12][13][14][15][16]. Ophthalmoscopy suffers from a low sensitivity even when performed by ophthalmologists [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Учитывая это, крайне важ-ным является её диагностика, направленная на отбор пациентов с такими стадиями поражения, при которых им можно оказать эффективную по-мощь [56]. В большинстве опубликованных работ на тему диабетической ретинопатии отмечается взаимо связь между сосудистыми изменениями и зрительными функциями [18,26].…”
Section: оценка зрительных функций при сахарном диабетеunclassified