1980
DOI: 10.1063/1.92044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scanning-electron-microscope observations of propagating acoustic waves in surface acoustic wave devices

Abstract: We report for the first time the observation of propagating acoustic waves from constant-overlap and apodized interdigital transducers on y-cut LiNbO3, obtained by a scanning electron microscope using the stroboscopic voltage contrast. It is the most convenient and fastest method known today of observing directly on screen the complex radiation patterns of interdigital transducers on piezoelectric substrates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the ability to quantitatively measure the out-of-plane vibration amplitude, optical interferometric methods are unable to measure in-plane vibration components. One competing approach is the observation of the electric field associated with SAW propagation in piezoelectric substrates [4], [5], [6], [7]: in scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations, electrons illuminate the surface under investigation and secondary electrons generated closest to the surface are collected to create an image representative of surface characteristics. Electric fields on the surface under investigation modulate the secondary electron path and hence the image observed: SAW propagating is observed using SEM.…”
Section: Context and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the ability to quantitatively measure the out-of-plane vibration amplitude, optical interferometric methods are unable to measure in-plane vibration components. One competing approach is the observation of the electric field associated with SAW propagation in piezoelectric substrates [4], [5], [6], [7]: in scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations, electrons illuminate the surface under investigation and secondary electrons generated closest to the surface are collected to create an image representative of surface characteristics. Electric fields on the surface under investigation modulate the secondary electron path and hence the image observed: SAW propagating is observed using SEM.…”
Section: Context and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unless faster SAW modes [1], [2] or materials [3] are found to be applicable on an industrial scale, submicron characterization tools have to be employed. The most common methods are based on optical probes [4], [5], which have the inherent disadvantage of the diffraction limited lateral resolution, electron probes [6], and more recently X-ray diffraction [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It cannot be considered as a truly non-contact method, as it can significantly influence the sample under study [48], although techniques have been developed to minimize the effect [49]. In fact, many of the available microscopy techniques, such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM) [50], have been adapted to study also surface vibrations. In addition to various scanning probe microscopy techniques, there have been attempts to visualize surface vibrations also with several other more exotic techniques, some of which are not non-destructive or non-contact [51][52][53].…”
Section: Optical Characterization Of Surface Vibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%