2020
DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2020/754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of USG & MRI in Female Pelvic Masses with Histological Correlation in Post-Operative Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In current study maximum number of pelvic masses were found to be fibroids followed by adenomyosis the results were in accordance to the reports published by Mishra et al The prominent complaints of patients with pelvic masses were observed to be abdominal pain, followed by lump in abdomen and bleeding P/V, thus results of current investigation thus depicted that pain or lump in lower abdomen can be considered as one of the most important complaints that should prompt a clinician to suspect a pelvic mass. The results were in accordance to the literature reports published by Usmani et al, Mishra et al, Anant et al and Hartman et al [21][22][23][24] A report published by Brown et al revealed that pelvic ultrasonography (US) remains the most frequently used imaging modality to detect and characterize adnexal masses, Brown et al also observed that majority of adnexal masses are benign and about 90% of adnexal masses can be adequately characterized with US alone. 25 Sonography allows a more elaborate assessment of morphologic and topological features of an adnexal mass.…”
Section: Disscussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In current study maximum number of pelvic masses were found to be fibroids followed by adenomyosis the results were in accordance to the reports published by Mishra et al The prominent complaints of patients with pelvic masses were observed to be abdominal pain, followed by lump in abdomen and bleeding P/V, thus results of current investigation thus depicted that pain or lump in lower abdomen can be considered as one of the most important complaints that should prompt a clinician to suspect a pelvic mass. The results were in accordance to the literature reports published by Usmani et al, Mishra et al, Anant et al and Hartman et al [21][22][23][24] A report published by Brown et al revealed that pelvic ultrasonography (US) remains the most frequently used imaging modality to detect and characterize adnexal masses, Brown et al also observed that majority of adnexal masses are benign and about 90% of adnexal masses can be adequately characterized with US alone. 25 Sonography allows a more elaborate assessment of morphologic and topological features of an adnexal mass.…”
Section: Disscussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The most common lesions were cystadenoma / cystadenofibroma contributing 23.4 %, endometriomas (14.8 %), subserosal / broad ligament / intramural leiomyomas with large exophytic component (12.3 %), hemorrhagic cysts (9.8 %), and dermoid cysts (6.1 %), tubo-ovarian masses (8.6%), simple cyst (4.8%), Krukenberg tumor (4.9%), and cystadenocarcinoma (6.1 %), carcinoma cervix with large exophytic component (2.4%) as per the study done by Usmani Y et al [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The Positive predictive value and negative predictive value of USG were found to be 83.33% and 91.67% respectively. According to Usmani Y et al, when compared to, histopathological examination; in 37 operated patients with 38 adnexal lesions, the specificity, and accuracy of USG in identifying malignancy were, 93.7 percent, and 93.7 percent, respectively [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations