Role of oxygen inhibited layer on shear bond strength of composites

Abstract

Background and Aim:Rising demand for aesthetic adhesive restorations has led to wide use of composites. A multilayer technique is recommended for success of these restorations. The surface layer of composite coming in contact with air forms a superficial sticky layer called oxygen inhibited layer, upon polymerization, allowing resins from both sides to cross the interface and form an interdiffusion zone. The present study was sought to test whether oxygen inhibited layer increases or decreases the shear bond strength at the interface of composites.Materials and Methods:A microhybrid composite Esthetic –X (Dentsply, Caulk) was used in this study. A cylindrical mold of composite, five mm thick and eight mm long, was prepared and embedded in acrylic resin molds after curing. This was placed in distilled water for two hours and sheared in universal testing machine at a cross head speed of one mm/sec.Statistical Analysis:Data analyzed statistically to determine the significant difference between the groups. Mean and standard deviation values were estimated for the study groups and compared by one way ANOVA.Results:No significant difference in shear bond strength of composites cured with and with out oxygen inhibited layer.Conclusions:The presence or absence of oxygen inhibited layer made no significant difference in shear bond strength of composite resins.

Effect of thermocycling on the bond strength of composite resin to bur and laser treated composite resin

“…It is composed of unreacted monomers and improves adhesion between materials [14,15]. Because of this layer, bond strength of incrementally built-up composite on the fresh resin composite is similar to the cohesive strength of the material [16].…”

Repair Strength in Simulated Restorations of Methacrylate- or Silorane-Based Composite Resins

“…In addition, free radicals are responsible for the adhesion among different layers of the restorative composite resin (9). It is possible that the chemical adhesion between new and old resins did not establish a reliable bonding in chemical conditions, considering that the quantity of free radicals decreases with the aging of dental restoration (10).…”

Comparison of marginal adaptation between a monoincremental resin with sonic activation and a conventional resin.

“…Therefore, the distances between the molecules vary as the molecules oscillate about their mean position", which explains the presence of bubbles in the group with SA. This could mean that there is a percentage of the resin that does not polymerize due to the presence of oxygen inside the bubbles, which acts as a polymerization inhibitor 29,30 .…”