2019
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of Drug-Drug Interactions in Out-Hospital Drug Dispensings in France: Results From the DRUG-Drug Interaction Prevalence Study

Abstract: Introduction: Drug interactions could account for 1% of hospitalizations in the general population and 2–5% of hospital admissions in the elderly. However, few data are available on the drugs concerned and the potential severity of the interactions encountered. We thus first aimed to estimate the prevalence of dispensings including drugs Contraindicated or Discommended because of Interactions (CDI codispensings) and to identify the most frequently involved drug pairs. Second, we aimed to investigate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
28
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
28
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Drugs for psychiatric conditions were the most frequently involved in multidrug interactions, accounting for 23.3% of the drugs involved (Table 3). Several prior studies of two-drug interacting pairs made similar observations [12][13][14][15][16][17]8]. The preponderance of psychotropic drugs in multidrug interactions may reflect the rising incidence of psychotropic polypharmacy [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Drugs for psychiatric conditions were the most frequently involved in multidrug interactions, accounting for 23.3% of the drugs involved (Table 3). Several prior studies of two-drug interacting pairs made similar observations [12][13][14][15][16][17]8]. The preponderance of psychotropic drugs in multidrug interactions may reflect the rising incidence of psychotropic polypharmacy [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…It is not easy to directly compare our observations with the results of other studies conducted in various countries due to diverse frameworks used to define pDDIs in terms of study periods varying from one month ( Merlo et al, 2001 ) to several years ( Linnarsson, 1993 ), different definitions of studied cohorts (e.g., outpatients, elderly, polymedicated patients), severity of pDDIs etc. Therefore, prevalence of pDDIs observed in general populations vary significantly ranging from 1.2 to 1.3% in Switzerland ( Bucher et al, 2016 ), 4% in France ( Létinier et al, 2019 ), 8.5% in Italy ( Tragni et al, 2013 ), up to 9.3% in Slovenia ( Jazbar et al, 2018 ). Out of these studies, the last one is particularly interesting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a 2019 French study of a health insurance database, the prevalence of interaction effects at contraindication levels was found to be 0.2%, which is significantly lower than the rate of 0.76% found in this study. The much higher rate of prevalence in this study may be accounted for by the fact that the sample population consisted of patients with high healthcare utilization of medical services, many of whom used excessive polypharmacy [27]. Patients may use a variety of drugs with similar side effects, which could result in intolerance or serious adverse drug events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%