Interest in patient adherence has increased in recent years, with a growing literature that shows the pervasiveness of poor adherence to appropriately prescribed medications. However, four decades of adherence research has not resulted in uniformity in the terminology used to describe deviations from prescribed therapies. The aim of this review was to propose a new taxonomy, in which adherence to medications is conceptualized, based on behavioural and pharmacological science, and which will support quantifiable parameters. A systematic literature review was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library and PsycINFO from database inception to 1 April 2009. The objective was to identify the different conceptual approaches to adherence research. Definitions were analyzed according to time and methodological perspectives. A taxonomic approach was subsequently derived, evaluated and discussed with international experts. More than 10 different terms describing medication-taking behaviour were identified through the literature review, often with differing meanings. The conceptual foundation for a new, transparent taxonomy relies on three elements, which make a clear distinction between processes that describe actions through established routines ('Adherence to medications' , 'Management of adherence') and the discipline that studies those processes ('Adherence-related sciences'). 'Adherence to medications' is the process by which patients take their medication as prescribed, further divided into three quantifiable phases: 'Initiation' , 'Implementation' and 'Discontinuation' . In response to the proliferation of ambiguous or unquantifiable terms in the literature on medication adherence, this research has resulted in a new conceptual foundation for a transparent taxonomy. The terms and definitions are focused on promoting consistency and quantification in terminology and methods to aid in the conduct, analysis and interpretation of scientific studies of medication adherence.

Despite doctors' expectations, non-compliance is common in short-term antibiotic therapy of respiratory tract infections (RTIs). This phenomenon has profound practical implications. It leads to ineffective management, the deterioration of patients' health, hospital admissions, additional costs and the emergence of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms. This article reviews methods of measuring compliance with antibiotics in the outpatient-based management of RTIs and research results. Causes of non-compliance are also discussed. Factors influencing compliance are analysed, as well as practical strategies for addressing non-compliance with antibiotic therapies for RTIs. The influence of the frequency of doses on compliance is particularly stressed, as it has been observed that once daily dosing has almost a 100% compliance rate. As a number of once-daily antibiotic preparations are available now, the possibility of using once-daily schedules for improving compliance in RTI cases is stressed.

The study demonstrates that patient compliance with once-daily gliclazide MR is significantly better than with twice-daily glibenclamide. Consistently better efficacy was observed for short-term (fasting glucose) and long-term glycaemic control (HbA(1c)) in the once-daily group. These results demonstrate the possible therapeutic advantages of once-daily agents over twice-daily agents in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

No abstract

Background: A randomized, controlled trial was conducted in an outpatient setting to examine the effect of beta-blocker dosing frequency on patient compliance, clinical outcome, and health-related quality of life in patients with stable angina pectoris. Methods: One hundred and twelve beta-blockers-naive outpatients with stable angina pectoris were randomized to receive betaxolol, 20 mg once daily or metoprolol tartrate, 50 mg twice daily for 8 weeks. The principal outcome measure was overall compliance measured electronically, whereas secondary outcome measures were drug effectiveness and health-related quality of life. Results: The overall compliance was 86.5 ± 21.3% in the betaxolol group versus 76.1 ± 26.3% in the metoprolol group (p < 0.01), and the correct number of doses was taken on 84.4 ± 21.6% and 64.0 ± 31.7% of treatment days, respectively (p < 0.0001). The percentage of missed doses was 14.5 ± 21.5% in the once-daily group and 24.8 ± 26.4% in the twice-daily group (p < 0.01). The percentage of doses taken in the correct time window (58.6% vs 42.0%, p = 0.01), correct interdose intervals (77.4% v 53.1%, p < 0.0001), and therapeutic coverage (85.6% vs 73.7%, p < 0.001) were signifi cantly higher in the once-daily group. Both studied drugs had similar antianginal effectiveness. Health-related quality of life improved in both groups, but this increase was more pronounced in the betaxolol arm in some dimensions. Conclusions:The study demonstrates that patient compliance with once-daily betaxolol is signifi cantly better than with twice daily metoprolol. Similarly, this treatment provides better quality of life. These results demonstrate possible therapeutic advantages of once-daily over twice-daily beta-blockers in the treatment of stable angina pectoris.