2013
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2013.2240316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RHBD Technique for Single-Event Charge Cancellation in Folded-Cascode Amplifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Xe ions have a higher LET than Kr ions, the cross-section for Xe-ion-induced ASETs is lower than the cross-section of Kr-ion-induced ASETs. This paradox can be explained through the pulse quenching phenomenon [2], [64]- [66], which has been previously observed or used to mitigate SETs in other analog or digital circuits such as digital inverters, current sources, switched capacitor amplifiers, continuous time amplifiers, folded cascode amplifiers and differential circuits design [6], [23], [63], [67]- [74]. In the next section we justify the measured results by focussing on the key topological difference between the two circuit classes, i.e.…”
Section: Pulse Quenching Phenomena In Measured Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Xe ions have a higher LET than Kr ions, the cross-section for Xe-ion-induced ASETs is lower than the cross-section of Kr-ion-induced ASETs. This paradox can be explained through the pulse quenching phenomenon [2], [64]- [66], which has been previously observed or used to mitigate SETs in other analog or digital circuits such as digital inverters, current sources, switched capacitor amplifiers, continuous time amplifiers, folded cascode amplifiers and differential circuits design [6], [23], [63], [67]- [74]. In the next section we justify the measured results by focussing on the key topological difference between the two circuit classes, i.e.…”
Section: Pulse Quenching Phenomena In Measured Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly in sub-micron technologies, charge sharing effects have been observed in digital [4], [19] and analog [12], [13], [15], [20] circuits. This can cause multiple errors by a single ion strike or even pulse quenching in ion-induced transients, resulting in a reduced overall sensitivity of the system against SEE [12], [13], [15], [20], [21]. Nevertheless, these effects are difficult to model or predict: main approaches to modeling involve complex, high computational cost simulations including technology computer assisted design tools (TCAD) integrated in complex multi-physical environments [22]- [25].…”
Section: Analogmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the fact that transistors of the differential stage were laid out to maximize device matching, it is logical to consider charge sharing effects as observed in digital [4], [6], [19], [41], [42] and analog circuits [20], [43], [44] built in sub-micron technologies. In fact, charge sharing has been proposed as a mechanism to desensitize sections of analog circuits and evaluated through laser experiments [10], [12], [13], [45]. Fig.…”
Section: A Experimental Observation Of Charge Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The delay cell consists of a pair of two inverters whose outputs are coupled in a feed-forward manner through a transmission gate. For RHBD amplifier design in the integrator, we apply the sensitive node active charge cancellation technique to bias circuit to protect sensitive nodes and the differential charge cancellation technique to promote charge sharing [14,15]. The push-pull follower as an output buffer should provide a low output resistance in operational amplifier, which causes a low impedance node at the integrator output.…”
Section: Implementation Of Fbvcomentioning
confidence: 99%