2003
DOI: 10.1590/s0073-47212003000300008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisão taxonômica e relações filogenéticas das espécies de Roeboides grupo-microlepis (Ostariophysi, Characiformes, Characidae)

Abstract: TAXONOMIC REVISION AND PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF THE ROEBOIDES MICROLEPIS SPECIES-GROUP (OSTARIOPHYSI, CHARACIFORMES, CHARACIDAE). TheRoeboides microlepis species-group is revised. Four species are recognized: R. myersii Gill, 1870 from the Amazon basin, R. microlepis (Reinhardt, 1851) from river Paraguay, middle and lower river Paraná, R. araguaito sp. nov. from the river Orinoco basin, and R. margareteae sp. nov. known only from Rio Parnaíba and Pindaré-Mearim, northeastern Brazil. The type-locality of R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
80
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(2 reference statements)
5
80
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Weitzman & Vari (1987) noted that species of Roeboides and Cynopotamus retained their larval pectoral fin structure in juveniles up to relatively large body sizes (i.e., 26 and 41 mm SL, respectively) and suggested that this feature could be a possible synapomorphy for an assemblage that included at least those three genera. Lucena (1998) analyzed this character in a broader context of the subfamily Characinae and hypothesized that the retention of a larval pectoral fin at larger body sizes is synapomorphic for a clade including Acanthocharax, Acestrocephalus, Charax, Cynopotamus, Galeocharax, Phenacogaster, and Roeboides. The Characinae (sensu Lucena, 1998 andLucena &) also included Priocharax, Gnathocharax, Heterocharax, Hoplocharax, and Lonchogenys.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Weitzman & Vari (1987) noted that species of Roeboides and Cynopotamus retained their larval pectoral fin structure in juveniles up to relatively large body sizes (i.e., 26 and 41 mm SL, respectively) and suggested that this feature could be a possible synapomorphy for an assemblage that included at least those three genera. Lucena (1998) analyzed this character in a broader context of the subfamily Characinae and hypothesized that the retention of a larval pectoral fin at larger body sizes is synapomorphic for a clade including Acanthocharax, Acestrocephalus, Charax, Cynopotamus, Galeocharax, Phenacogaster, and Roeboides. The Characinae (sensu Lucena, 1998 andLucena &) also included Priocharax, Gnathocharax, Heterocharax, Hoplocharax, and Lonchogenys.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lucena (1998) analyzed this character in a broader context of the subfamily Characinae and hypothesized that the retention of a larval pectoral fin at larger body sizes is synapomorphic for a clade including Acanthocharax, Acestrocephalus, Charax, Cynopotamus, Galeocharax, Phenacogaster, and Roeboides. The Characinae (sensu Lucena, 1998 andLucena & also included Priocharax, Gnathocharax, Heterocharax, Hoplocharax, and Lonchogenys. According to the scheme of phylogenetic relationships proposed for the Characinae by Lucena (1998), the retention of the larval pectoral fin in adults of Priocharax is autapomorphic for that genus, because Gnathocharax, Heterocharax, Hoplocharax, and Lonchogenys have a pectoral fin with the typical adult anatomical structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roeboides microlepis was known until recently as Roeboides bonariensis (Steindachner, 1879), but Lucena (2003), in his taxonomic revision of the genus Roeboides, considered R. bonariensis a synonym of R. microlepis. Voucher specimens were deposited in the Ichthyological Collection of Núcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aqüicultura (Nupélia): NUP 937 (19 ), 3129 (10), 921 (64 ), 930 (20 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) is a diminute characid that occurs in the Amazonas, Essequibo and Orinoco basins (Toledo-Piza, 2000) and was placed by Géry (1966) in a tribe, the Heterocharacini, that later was included in the Characinae (e.g., Géry, 1977;Lucena, 1998;Lucena & Menezes, 2003). More recently, Mirande (2009;2010) and Mattox & ToledoPiza (2012) split this subfamily in a more restricted Characinae and the distantly related Heterocharacinae, and the latter authors included in the Heterocharacinae the diminute genera Heterocharax, Hoplocharax, Gnathocharax, Lonchogenys, and Priocharax (= tribe Heterocharacini) (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%