2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response bias in the measurement of salesperson orientations: The role of impression management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, social desirability (Logan, Claar, & Scharff, 2008) and impression management (Johnson, Sivads, & Kashyap, 2009) may influence willingness to disclose cyberbullying perpetration and thus the validity of questionnaire responses (Davis, Thake, & Vilhena, 2010). Indeed, this concern is consistent with the higher levels of cyberbullying victimisation reported by participants compared to perpetration.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In particular, social desirability (Logan, Claar, & Scharff, 2008) and impression management (Johnson, Sivads, & Kashyap, 2009) may influence willingness to disclose cyberbullying perpetration and thus the validity of questionnaire responses (Davis, Thake, & Vilhena, 2010). Indeed, this concern is consistent with the higher levels of cyberbullying victimisation reported by participants compared to perpetration.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Salespersons assume a significant job in sales, as they contact and interact with customers on behalf of the manufacturers. The success of marketing strategy mainly depends on the salesperson [37]. For consumers, the friendliness of salespersons has an important impact on whether they could feel comfortable or stress-free during the shopping process.…”
Section: Salesperson Selling Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, although results of the analyses indicate that customer orientation has a high level of correlation with sales performance (r=0.475, p<0.01), it tends to lose its significance in terms of its direct effects (β=-0.014, p>0.10) during the presence of other factors. While many previous studies found positive relations between customer orientation and sales performance (Franke & Park, 2006;Wachner et al, 2009;Schwepker & Good, 2012) some others (Johnson et al, 2009;Homburg, 2011) did not. Goad and Jaramillo (2014) stated that the influence of customer orientation depends on the type of the customer.…”
Section: Business Management and Strategymentioning
confidence: 86%